Effects of Variation in System Responsiveness on User Performance in Virtual Environments

System responsiveness (SR) is defined as the elapsed time until a system responds to user control. SR fluctuates over time, so it must be described statistically with mean (MSR) and standard deviation (SDSR). In this paper, we examine SR in virtual environments (VEs), outlining its components and methods of experimental measurement and manipulation. Three studies of MSR and SDSR effects on performance of grasp and placement tasks are then presented. The studies used within-subjects designs with 11, 12, and 10 participants, respectively. Results showed that SDSR affected performance only if it was above 82 ms. Placement required more frequent visual feedback and was more sensitive to SR. We infer that VE designers need not tightly control SDSR and may wish to vary SR control based on required visual feedback frequency. These results may be used to improve the human-computer interface in a wide range of interactive graphical applications, including scientific visualization, training, mental health, and entertainment.

[1]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  The information visualizer, an information workspace , 1991, CHI.

[2]  Mark R. Mine.  Characterization of End-to-End Delays in Head-Mounted Display Systems , 1993 .

[3]  Chris Shaw,et al.  On temporal-spatial realism in the virtual reality environment , 1991, UIST '91.

[4]  W R Ferrell.  Delayed Force Feedback1 , 1966, Human factors.

[5]  David Zeltzer,et al.  Three Dimensional Visual Display Systems for Virtual Environments , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  C. Wickens.  Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[7]  Matthias M. Wloka.  Lag in Multiprocessor Virtual Reality , 1995, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  Henry Fuchs,et al.  Research directions in virtual environments: report of an NSF Invitational Workshop, March 23-24, 1992, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , 1992, COMG.

[9]  Carlo H. Séquin,et al.  Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame rates during visualization of complex virtual environments , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  Gregory K. Tharp,et al.  Timing considerations of helmet-mounted display performance , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Towards image realism with interactive update rates in complex virtual building environments , 1990, I3D '90.

[12]  Rich Gossweiler,et al.  Virtual Reality on Five Dollars a Day , 1991 .

[13]  Warren Robinett,et al.  Implementing virtual reality , 1994, CHI '94.

[14]  Vivek Ranadivé.  Video resolution, frame rate and grayscale tradeoffs under limited bandwidth for undersea teleoperation , 1980 .

[15]  A. van Dam,et al.  VR as a forcing function: Software implications of a new paradigm , 1993 .

[16]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Reaching for objects in VR displays: lag and frame rate , 1994, TCHI.

[17]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[18]  Benjamin Watson.  Level of detail management , 1998 .

[19]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[20]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of frame time variation on VR task performance , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE 1997 Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality.