A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with ‘natural’ negative outputs and inputs

This paper is primarily concerned with data envelopment analysis (DEA) of systems where negative outputs and negative inputs arise naturally. Examples of situations in which both negative inputs and negative outputs occur are given. More attention has been paid, in the literature, to the former type of problem. Most available DEA software does not solve this type of problem or copes with negative outputs and possibly negative inputs by assigning zero weights to them. A modified slacks-based measure (MSBM) model is presented, in which both negative outputs and negative inputs occur. The MSBM model overcomes the lack of translation invariance in the slacks-based measure model by drawing on the ideas from the range directional model (RDM). The MSBM model takes into account individual input and output slacks, which provides more precise evaluation of inefficient decision-making units (DMUs). It therefore, generally leads to lower efficiencies for inefficient DMUs than the RDM.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[3]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANTS: AN EXTENSION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[5]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Chapter 3 Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: A generalization , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Wenbin Liu,et al.  Preference, Production and Performance in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  Georg Westermann,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector , 1999 .

[9]  Renato De Leone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Optimization.

[10]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Measuring physical efficiency of domestic airports in Taiwan with undesirable outputs and environmental factors , 2004 .

[11]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[12]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[13]  T. Ueda,et al.  APPLICATION OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR PARSIMONIOUS SUMMARIZATION OF DEA INPUTS AND/OR OUTPUTS , 1997 .

[14]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[15]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[18]  Wenbin Liu,et al.  DEA Models via Goal Programming , 1999 .