CFD simulations of flow and concentration polarization in spacer-filled channels for application to water desalination

Abstract Reverse osmosis (RO) is widely used for the production of drinking water from brackish and sea water. In RO process, pressure is used to separate water and salts by allowing water to pass through a semi-permeable membrane leaving the salts behind. Therefore, controlling membrane fouling will keep the productivity at its optimum condition. Having spacer filaments in the feed channel has proved to reduce the concentration polarization on the surfaces of the membrane and therefore fouling. In this paper computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out for fluid flow through rectangular channels filled with spacers. In order to (1) understand the effect of the spacers on the increase of shear stress on the membrane surface, (2) study the reduction of precipitated salt on the membrane surface and (3) monitor the mass transfer performance across the membrane surface, a computational model that includes all of the important physical processes occurring in membrane systems is required. This paper describes bespoke enhancements to a commercial CFD package, ANSYS-CFX, for modelling the selective transfer of components from the feed channel to the permeate channel through the membrane surface. To validate the new code, this work has been verified against published work and has proved to be as accurate. Further simulations were then carried out, for two different filament configurations, for channel Reynolds numbers up to 800 and with fully functioning dual-membrane channels, as found in industrial spiral-wound desalination modules for example. Results suggest that the zigzagging spacers’ type is more desirable comparing with the submerged one in maintaining the membrane and desalination system performance.

[1]  Chi Tien,et al.  Concentration Polarization Effects in a Reverse Osmosis System , 1965 .

[2]  C. Tien,et al.  Analysis of continuous reverse osmosis systems for desalination , 1966 .

[3]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Effects of natural convection instability on membrane performance in dead-end and cross-flow ultrafiltration , 1996 .

[4]  R. Baker Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[5]  Vítor Geraldes,et al.  Flow and mass transfer modelling of nanofiltration , 2001 .

[6]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Spiral wound modules and spacers - Review and analysis , 2004 .

[7]  Viriato Semiao,et al.  The effect of the ladder-type spacers configuration in NF spiral-wound modules on the concentration boundary layers disruption☆ , 2002 .

[8]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems , 1997 .

[9]  G. Schock,et al.  Mass transfer and pressure loss in spiral wound modules , 1987 .

[10]  P. L. T. Brian,et al.  Concentration Polar zation in Reverse Osmosis Desalination with Variable Flux and Incomplete Salt Rejection , 1965 .

[11]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Simulation of the Flow around Spacer Filaments between Narrow Channel Walls. 1. Hydrodynamics , 2002 .

[12]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow and permeation for pressure-driven membrane processes , 2002 .

[13]  Tzvetan Kotzev,et al.  Numerical study of the fluid dynamics and mass transfer of an ultrafiltration performance in a tube membrane module , 1994 .

[14]  Vítor Geraldes,et al.  Nanofiltration mass transfer at the entrance region of a slit laminar flow , 1998 .

[15]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  A computational fluids dynamics study of buoyancy effects in reverse osmosis , 2004 .

[16]  Lihan Huang,et al.  Finite element analysis as a tool for crossflow membrane filter simulation , 1999 .

[17]  Sudipta Bhattacharya,et al.  Concentration polarization, separation factor, and Peclet number in membrane processes , 1997 .

[18]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels , 2003 .

[19]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  A CFD study of unsteady flow in narrow spacer-filled channels for spiral-wound membrane modules , 2002 .

[20]  E. Lightfoot,et al.  Velocity Profiles in Porous-Walled Ducts , 1970 .

[21]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Simulation of Unsteady Flow and Vortex Shedding for Narrow Spacer-Filled Channels , 2003 .

[22]  S. G. Yiantsios,et al.  Numerical simulation of the flow in a plane-channel containing a periodic array of cylindrical turbulence promoters , 2004 .

[23]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Simulation of the Flow around Spacer Filaments between Channel Walls. 2. Mass-Transfer Enhancement , 2002 .

[24]  Robert L. Laurence,et al.  Influence of slip velocity at a membrane surface on ultrafiltration performance—I. Channel flow system , 1979 .

[26]  A. Michaels Effects of feed-side solute polarization on pervaporative stripping of volatile organic solutes from dilute aqueous solution: a generalized analytical treatment , 1995 .

[27]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  CFD simulations of net-type turbulence promoters in a narrow channel , 2001 .

[28]  A. B. de Haan,et al.  Optimization of commercial net spacers in spiral wound membrane modules , 2002 .

[29]  H. Yeh,et al.  Analysis of the slip effect on the permeate flux in membrane ultrafiltration , 1999 .