Using UAV Multispectral Images for Classification of Forest Burn Severity—A Case Study of the 2019 Gangneung Forest Fire

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing has limitations in acquiring images before a forest fire, although burn severity can be analyzed by comparing images before and after a fire. Determining the burned surface area is a challenging class in the analysis of burn area severity because it looks unburned in images from aircraft or satellites. This study analyzes the availability of multispectral UAV images that can be used to classify burn severity, including the burned surface class. RedEdge multispectral UAV image was acquired after a forest fire, which was then processed into a mosaic reflectance image. Hundreds of samples were collected for each burn severity class, and they were used as training and validation samples for classification. Maximum likelihood (MLH), spectral angle mapper (SAM), and thresholding of a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were used as classifiers. In the results, all classifiers showed high overall accuracy. The classifiers also showed high accuracy for classification of the burned surface, even though there was some confusion among spectrally similar classes, unburned pine, and unburned deciduous. Therefore, multispectral UAV images can be used to analyze burn severity after a forest fire. Additionally, NDVI thresholding can also be an easy and accurate method, although thresholds should be generalized in the future.

[1]  J. W. Wagtendonk,et al.  Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity , 2004 .

[2]  Fernando Carvajal-Ramírez,et al.  Evaluation of Fire Severity Indices Based on Pre- and Post-Fire Multispectral Imagery Sensed from UAV , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[3]  George P. Petropoulos,et al.  Determining the use of Sentinel-2A MSI for wildfire burning & severity detection , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[4]  Jurjen van der Sluijs,et al.  Calibrating Satellite-Based Indices of Burn Severity from UAV-Derived Metrics of a Burned Boreal Forest in NWT, Canada , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[5]  F. Rossi,et al.  Combining Satellite and UAV Imagery to Delineate Forest Cover and Basal Area after Mixed-Severity Fires , 2018 .

[6]  V. Caselles,et al.  Mapping burns and natural reforestation using thematic Mapper data , 1991 .

[7]  R.E.E. Jongschaap,et al.  Imaging spectrometry for agricultural applications , 2002 .

[8]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Federico Filipponi,et al.  BAIS2: Burned Area Index for Sentinel-2 , 2018 .

[10]  Bang Nguyen Tran,et al.  Evaluation of Spectral Indices for Assessing Fire Severity in Australian Temperate Forests , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Mark Noonan,et al.  The post-fire measurement of fire severity and intensity in the Christmas 2001 Sydney wildfires , 2004 .

[12]  S. Phinn,et al.  Measuring fire severity using UAV imagery in semi-arid central Queensland, Australia , 2017 .

[13]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[14]  Andrea Berton,et al.  Forestry applications of UAVs in Europe: a review , 2017 .

[15]  S. Stephens,et al.  Spatial patterns of large natural fires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  Jose M. Cardoso Pereira,et al.  An assessment of vegetation fire in Africa (1981–1991): Burned areas, burned biomass, and atmospheric emissions , 1999 .

[17]  Lluís Brotons,et al.  Potencial de las imágenes UAV como datos de verdad terreno para la clasificación de la severidad de quema de imágenes Landsat: aproximaciones a un producto útil para la gestión post incendio , 2017 .

[18]  R. Hartford,et al.  When It's Hot, It's Hot ... or Maybe It's Not! (Surface Flaming May Not Portend Extensive Soil Heating) , 1992 .

[19]  Jonathon J. Donager,et al.  UAV lidar and hyperspectral fusion for forest monitoring in the southwestern USA , 2017 .

[20]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Postfire Vegetation Survey Campaigns through Large and Heterogeneous Areas: Opportunities and Challenges , 2018, Sensors.

[21]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Mapping forest post-fire canopy consumption in several overstory types using multi-temporal Landsat TM and ETM data , 2002 .

[22]  D. Verbyla,et al.  Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM , 2005 .

[23]  A. Smith,et al.  Remote classification of head and backfire types from MODIS fire radiative power and smoke plume observations , 2005 .

[24]  Daniel G. Neary,et al.  Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis , 1999 .

[25]  E. Chuvieco,et al.  Assessment of different spectral indices in the red-near-infrared spectral domain for burned land discrimination , 2002 .

[26]  L. Tang,et al.  Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices , 2015, Journal of Forestry Research.