Differentiating sex offences: a behaviorally based thematic classification of stranger rapes.

It is hypothesized that stranger rape victim statements will reveal a scale of violation experienced by the victim, ranging from personal violation, through to physical violation, and finally, at the most extreme level, sexual violation. It is also hypothesized that offences can be differentiated in terms of one of four themes: hostile, controlling, stealing, or involving. To test these hypotheses, crime scene data from 112 rapes were analyzed by the multi-dimensional scaling procedure Smallest Space Analysis. The results provide empirical support for a composite model of rape consisting of four behavioral themes as different expressions of various intensities of violation. The results also suggest that stranger rapes may be less about power and control than about hostility and pseudo-intimacy. The proposed model has implications for the classification of rape, the investigation of sexual crimes, and the treatment of victims.

[1]  R. Knight.  Validation of a Typology for Rapists , 1999 .

[2]  Samuel Shye,et al.  Introduction to Facet Theory: Content Design and Intrinsic Data Analysis in Behavioral Research , 1994 .

[3]  David V. Canter,et al.  BURGLARS' SPECIALISATION: DEVELOPMENT OF A THEMATIC APPROACH IN INVESTIGATIVE PSYCHOLOGY , 2004 .

[4]  T. Seghorn,et al.  The psychology of rapists. , 1971, Seminars in psychiatry.

[5]  Stuart Kirby,et al.  Paedophilia: Pathology, criminality, or both? The development of a multivariate model of offence behaviour in child sexual abuse , 1998 .

[6]  Janet I. Warren,et al.  Serial Rape , 1989 .

[7]  R A Knight,et al.  Validating the components of a taxonomic system for rapists: a path analytic approach. , 1988, The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[8]  D V Canter,et al.  Differentiating stranger murders: profiling offender characteristics from behavioral styles. , 1999, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[9]  S. Levy,et al.  Lawful Roles of Facets in Social Theories , 1985 .

[10]  S. Feshbach,et al.  THE FUNCTION OF AGGRESSION AND THE REGULATION OF AGGRESSIVE DRIVE. , 1964, Psychological review.

[11]  David V. Canter,et al.  Sexual Offenses Against Children as the Abusive Exploitation of Conventional Adult-Child Relationships , 2001 .

[12]  I. Borg,et al.  Facet Theory: Form and Content , 1995 .

[13]  H. Conte,et al.  Circumplex models of personality and emotions , 1997 .

[14]  A. Groth,et al.  Rape: power, anger, and sexuality. , 1977, The American journal of psychiatry.

[15]  R. Knight,et al.  Determining male sexual offender subtypes using cluster analysis , 1988, Journal of Quantitative Criminology.

[16]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1981 .

[17]  L. Alison,et al.  Vicious circles: accounts of stranger sexual assault reflect abusive variants of conventional interactions , 2003 .

[18]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. , 1955 .

[19]  R. Knight,et al.  Predictive Validity of Lifestyle Impulsivity for Rapists , 1995 .

[20]  W. Marshall.  Intimacy, loneliness and sexual offenders. , 1989, Behaviour research and therapy.

[21]  Curt R. Bartol,et al.  Criminal Behavior: A Psychosocial Approach , 1986 .

[22]  Raymond A. Knight,et al.  Predicting Rapist Type from Crime-Scene Variables , 1998 .

[23]  L. Cohen,et al.  The Psychological Aftermath of Rape: Long-Term Effects and Individual Differences in Recovery , 1987 .

[24]  R. Knight,et al.  The Development, Reliability, and Validity of an Inventory for the Multidimensional Assessment of Sex and Aggression , 1994 .

[25]  A. Groth,et al.  Men Who Rape: The Psychology of the Offender , 1979 .

[26]  D. Canter.  Offender profiling and criminal differentiation , 2000 .

[27]  E. Foa,et al.  Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Following Assault: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings , 1995 .