Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement

Public procurement accounts for a significant proportion of overall demand for goods and services and is increasingly seen as an attractive and feasible instrument for furthering the goals of innovation policy. However, public procurement is already expected to address a wide range of social goals. Much of the current debate about harnessing procurement to promote innovation draws upon a limited set of examples which are not representative of the bulk of public purchasing and tend to downplay diversity in procurement practices and in the types of goods and services procured. They also downplay diversity in the nature of innovations and in the range of ways that procurement can impact upon innovation. A one-size-fits-all model is unlikely to work across all procurement contexts yet all types of public procurement are likely to have impacts upon innovation by shaping the demand environment in which suppliers innovate and compete. We propose a framework and typology based on the nature of the goods and services procured in order to explore the potential impacts upon markets and innovation of each. We conclude that public purchasing should first and foremost remain concerned with proximate public policy goals and that, rather than trying to co-opt public procurement into the innovation policy toolbox, policy-makers should focus on promoting innovation-friendly practices across all types of procurement at all levels of governance.

[1]  T. Kalvet,et al.  Urban Competitiveness and Public Procurement for Innovation , 2011 .

[2]  M. Guerzoni The impact of market size and users’ sophistication on innovation: the patterns of demand , 2010 .

[3]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: User-Producer Relationships, National Systems of Innovation and Internationalisation , 2010 .

[4]  W. Phillips,et al.  Public Procurement of Innovation Diffusion: Exploring the Role of Institutions and Institutional Coordination. , 2009 .

[5]  W. Sofka,et al.  Innovation on Demand: Can Public Procurement Drive Market Success of Innovations , 2008 .

[6]  L. Hommen,et al.  Public procurement and innovation: towards a taxonomy , 2008 .

[7]  Kim Loader The Challenge of Competitive Procurement: Value for Money Versus Small Business Support , 2007 .

[8]  L. Georghiou,et al.  Public procurement and innovation?Resurrecting the demand side , 2007 .

[9]  F. Malerba Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges , 2007 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferences , 2007 .

[11]  S. Klepper,et al.  Submarkets and the evolution of market structure , 2006 .

[12]  Luís M. B. Cabral,et al.  Handbook of Procurement: Procuring innovations , 2006 .

[13]  Nicola Dimitri,et al.  Handbook of Procurement: Multi-contract tendering procedures and package bidding in procurement , 2006 .

[14]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Creating an Innovative Europe: report of the independent expert group on R&D and innovation , 2006 .

[15]  Benoît Demil,et al.  The box : how the shipping container made the world smaller and the world economy bigger , 2006 .

[16]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Innovation and Public Procurement. Review of Issues at Stake , 2005 .

[17]  H. Walker,et al.  Promoting competitive markets: The role of public procurement , 2005 .

[18]  Cees J. Gelderman,et al.  Purchasing portfolio models: a critique and update , 2005 .

[19]  C. McCrudden Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes , 2004 .

[20]  Sijun Wang,et al.  Government/business relationships: insights into contract implementation , 2004 .

[21]  I. Bache,et al.  Multi-level governance , 2004 .

[22]  Marian Beise,et al.  Assessing the lead market potential of countries for innovation projects , 2004 .

[23]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[24]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change , 2005 .

[25]  Cees J. Gelderman,et al.  Strategic Direction through Purchasing Portfolio Management: A Case Study , 2002 .

[26]  LevinthalDaniel,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution , 2001 .

[27]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[28]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  The economic contribution of information technology: Towards comparative and user studies , 2001 .

[29]  R. Langlois Knowledge, consumption, and endogenous growth , 2000 .

[30]  M. Fridlund,et al.  Procuring Products and Power: Developing International Competitiveness in Swedish Electrotechnology and Electric Power , 2000 .

[31]  M. Fridlund Switching Relations and Trajectories: The Development Procurement of the Axe Swedish Switching Technology , 2000 .

[32]  P Windrum,et al.  Is Product Life Cycle Theory a Special Case , 1999 .

[33]  John Sutton,et al.  Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History , 1998 .

[34]  C. Birchenhall,et al.  Is product life cycle theory a special case? Dominant designs and the emergence of market niches through coevolutionary-learning , 1998 .

[35]  M. Storper The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[36]  S. Klepper Industry Life Cycles , 1997 .

[37]  John Howells,et al.  Rethinking the Market-Technology Relationship for Innovation , 1997 .

[38]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[39]  A. Erridge,et al.  Public procurement, competition and partnership , 1994 .

[40]  Robert Dalpé,et al.  Effects of government procurement on industrial innovation , 1994 .

[41]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[42]  C. Debresson,et al.  The public sector as first user of innovations , 1992 .

[43]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy , 1990 .

[44]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[45]  J. William,et al.  Innovation : Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction : Research Policy , 1987 .

[46]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[47]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[48]  R. Rothwell Creating a Regional Innovation‐Oriented Infrastructure: The Role of Public Procurement* , 1984 .

[49]  Nathan,et al.  The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[50]  Morton I. Kamien,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey , 1975 .

[51]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[52]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .