Applicability of the WHO Maternal Near Miss Criteria in a Low-Resource Setting

Background Maternal near misses are increasingly used to study quality of obstetric care. Inclusion criteria for the identification of near misses are diverse and studies not comparable. WHO developed universal near miss inclusion criteria in 2009 and these criteria have been validated in Brazil and Canada. Objectives To validate and refine the WHO near miss criteria in a low-resource setting. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in a rural referral hospital in Tanzania. From November 2009 until November 2011, all cases of maternal death (MD) and maternal near miss (MNM) were included. For identification of MNM, a local modification of the WHO near miss criteria was used, because most laboratory-based and some management-based criteria could not be applied in this setting. Disease-based criteria were added as they reflect severe maternal morbidity. In the absence of a gold standard for identification of MNM, the clinical WHO criteria were validated for identification of MD. Results 32 MD and 216 MNM were identified using the locally adapted near miss criteria; case fatality rate (CFR) was 12.9%. WHO near miss criteria identified only 60 MNM (CFR 35.6%). All clinical criteria, 25% of the laboratory-based criteria and 50% of the management-based criteria could be applied. The threshold of five units of blood for identification of MNM led to underreporting of MNM. Clinical criteria showed specificity of 99.5% (95%CI: 99.4%–99.7%) and sensitivity of 100% (95%CI: 91.1%–100%). Some inclusion criteria did not contribute to the identification of cases and therefore may be eligible for removal. Conclusion The applicability of the WHO near miss criteria depends on the local context, e.g. level of health care. The clinical criteria showed good validity. Lowering the threshold for blood transfusion from five to two units in settings without blood bank and addition of disease-based criteria in low-resource settings is recommended.

[1]  T. Meguid,et al.  The WHO Maternal Near Miss Approach: Consequences at Malawian District Level , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  L. Say,et al.  The WHO Maternal Near-Miss Approach and the Maternal Severity Index Model (MSI): Tools for Assessing the Management of Severe Maternal Morbidity , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  D. Chou,et al.  The prevalence of maternal near miss: a systematic review , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  D. Urassa,et al.  Using audit to enhance quality of maternity care in resource limited countries: lessons learnt from rural Tanzania , 2011, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[5]  P. Lumbiganon,et al.  The world health organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health: study protocol , 2011, BMC health services research.

[6]  D. Kaye,et al.  Systematic review of the magnitude and case fatality ratio for severe maternal morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa between 1995 and 2010 , 2011, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[7]  Mohsen Naghavi,et al.  Progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis , 2011, The Lancet.

[8]  L. Say,et al.  Pre-validation of the WHO organ dysfunction based criteria for identification of maternal near miss , 2011, Reproductive health.

[9]  J. V. van Roosmalen,et al.  Reduction of Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity and Maternal Mortality in Thyolo District, Malawi: The Impact of Obstetric Audit , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  S. Fonseca,et al.  Severe maternal morbidity and near misses in a regional reference hospital. , 2011, Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology.

[11]  S. C. Fonseca,et al.  Morbidade Materna Grave e Near Misses em Hospital de Referência Regional , 2011 .

[12]  A. Donner,et al.  Maternal near miss and maternal death in the World Health Organization's 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[13]  L. Say,et al.  Maternal near miss--towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[14]  W. Graham,et al.  Criterion-based clinical audit in obstetrics: bridging the quality gap? , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[15]  C. Ronsmans.  Severe acute maternal morbidity in low-income countries. , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[16]  L. Say,et al.  WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality: the prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (near miss) , 2004, Reproductive health.

[17]  R. Pattinson,et al.  Can enquiries into severe acute maternal morbidity act as a surrogate for maternal death enquiries? , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  R. T. Lie,et al.  Causes and characteristics of maternal deaths in rural northern Tanzania , 2002, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[19]  Nyongeza ya Tatu,et al.  United Republic of Tanzania , 2002, National Accounts Statistics: Main Aggregates and Detailed Tables 2019.

[20]  J. Penny.  Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition of a near‐miss , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  J. Vincent,et al.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure , 1996, Intensive Care Medicine.

[22]  J. V. van Roosmalen,et al.  Severe acute maternal morbidity in high-income countries. , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.