A validity study of four empathy instruments.

The construct validity of four empathy instruments were evaluated through examining group differences and correlations between tests. Subjects were 18 registered nurses (RNs) and 32 nursing assistants (NAs). Instruments used were the Empathy Test (Layton, 1979), the Carkhuff (1969a, 1969b) Empathic Understanding in Interpersonal Processes Scale, the empathy subtest of the Barrett-Lennard (1962) Relationship Inventory, and LaMonica's (1981) Empathy Construct Rating Scale (ECRS). The first hypothesis, that RNs would score significantly higher than NAs on all empathy measures, was confirmed (p less than .0003 to p less than .027). The second hypothesis, that the various empathy measures would be positively related, was partially confirmed. The Carkhuff scale was significantly correlated with the ECRS (r = .25, p less than .05). The ECRS and the Barrett-Lennard also were correlated (r = .78, p less than .001). Results are interpreted using Barrett-Lennard's (1981) theory of empathy.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[2]  D. Brown,et al.  A comparison of four empathy instruments in simulated patient-medical student interactions. , 1985, Journal of medical education.

[3]  G. A. Gladstein.  Understanding empathy: Integrating counseling, developmental, and social psychology perspectives. , 1983 .

[4]  J. Gagan.  Methodological notes on empathy , 1983, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[5]  E. L. Monica.  Construct validity of an empathy instrument. , 1981 .

[6]  K. Kushner,et al.  Empathic perceptions of nursing students: self-reported and actual ability. , 1981, Research in nursing & health.

[7]  G. Barrett‐Lennard,et al.  The empathy cycle: Refinement of a nuclear concept. , 1981 .

[8]  J. Layton,et al.  The use of modeling to teach empathy to nursing students. , 1979, Research in nursing & health.

[9]  Susan B. Shipley.  Instruments for Use in Nursing Education Research , 1979 .

[10]  J. Ford,et al.  Research on Training Counselors and Clinicians , 1979 .

[11]  G. Forsyth.  Exploration of Empathy in Nurse‐Client Interaction , 1979, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[12]  C. Stetler.  Relationship of Perceived Empathy to Nurses' Communication , 1977, Nursing research.

[13]  Jones Sl,et al.  Setting: a contextual variable associated with empathy. , 1977 .

[14]  Carl R. Rogers,et al.  Empathic: An Unappreciated Way of Being , 1975 .

[15]  R. R. Kurtz,et al.  Different approaches to the measurement of therapist empathy and their relationship to therapy outcomes. , 1972, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  Estimation of the reliability of ratings , 1951 .

[18]  G. A. Gladstein.  The Role of Empathy in Counseling: Theoretical Considerations , 1987 .

[19]  A. Anastasi.  Evolving Concepts of Test Validation , 1986 .

[20]  Brunt Jh.  An exploration of the relationship between nurses' empathy and technology. , 1985 .

[21]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[22]  Ruth Scheeffer.  Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy , 1971 .

[23]  G. Barrett‐Lennard,et al.  Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in therapeutic change. , 1962 .

[24]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.