Melanoma Recognition Using Representative and Discriminative Kernel Classifiers

Malignant melanoma is the most deadly form of skin lesion. Early diagnosis is of critical importance to patient survival. Existent visual recognition algorithms for skin lesions classification focus mostly on segmentation and feature extraction. In this paper instead we put the emphasis on the learning process by using two kernel-based classifiers. We chose a discriminative approach using support vector machines, and a probabilistic approach using spin glass-Markov random fields. We benchmarked these algorithms against the (to our knowledge) state-of-the-art method on melanoma recognition, exploring how performance changes by using color or textural features, and how it is affected by the quality of the segmentation mask. We show with extensive experiments that the support vector machine approach outperforms the existing method and, on two classes out of three, it achieves performances comparable to those obtained by expert clinicians.

[1]  D. Rigel,et al.  Malignant melanoma: Prevention, early detection, and treatment in the 21st century , 2000, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Recognition with local features: the kernel recipe , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[3]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Learning with kernels , 1998 .

[4]  F. Bray,et al.  Changing epidemiology of malignant cutaneous melanoma in Europe 1953–1997: Rising trends in incidence and mortality but recent stabilizations in Western Europe and decreases in Scandinavia , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[5]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  A study on several Machine-learning methods for classification of Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Rita Cucchiara,et al.  A new algorithm for border description of polarized light surface microscopic images of pigmented skin lesions , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Harald Ganster,et al.  Automated Melanoma Recognition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Recognition without Correspondence using Multidimensional Receptive Field Histograms , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[10]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[11]  G E Gigante,et al.  A new kernel method for microcalcification detection: Spin Glass-Markov Random Fields. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[12]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  A new kernel method for object recognition:spin glass-Markov random fields , 2004 .

[13]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks, 1st Edition , 1989 .

[14]  SchieleBernt,et al.  Recognition without Correspondence using MultidimensionalReceptive Field Histograms , 2000 .

[15]  Eric Lefevre,et al.  Knowledge modeling methods in the framework of evidence theory: an experimental comparison for melanoma detection , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[16]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Melanoma prediction using data mining system LERS , 2001, 25th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC 2001.