Peak Torque Occurrence in the Range of Motion During Isokinetic Extension and Flexion of the Knee

The purpose of this study was to 1) assess the knee angles of hamstring and quadriceps peak torques at slow (60 degrees.sec-1) and moderate (180 degrees.sec-1) isokinetic velocities in healthy adult males (N = 143) and females (N = 106), 2) determine if velocity has an effect on these peak torque angles, and 3) determine if subject's age, sex, and muscle strength have an effect on the results. The Cybex II dynamometer was used to record the measurements. At 60 degrees.sec-1, the mean peak torque for the hamstrings occurred at 33 degrees for men and 37 degrees for women (p < 0.001) (0 degree = full extension). At 180 degrees.sec-1, the corresponding angles were 40 and 44 degrees (p < 0.01). In both groups the increase was 7 degrees (p < 0.001). At 60 degrees.sec-1, the peak torque angle of the quadriceps was 54 degrees in both groups. At 180 degrees.sec-1, the angle occurred significantly later in men (11 degrees later) and in women (10 degrees later) (p < 0.001 for both). Subject's age (18 to 40 years) did not affect the results. In female hamstrings, the knee angle of peak torque had a highly significant (p < 0.001) negative correlation to muscle strength; that is, in female hamstrings, the peak torque angles occurred later in the range of motion when muscle strength decreased. This possibly explained the difference observed between men and women in the peak torque angles of hamstrings. In conclusion, people involved in isokinetic testing of muscular performance should be aware that the peak torque occurs later in the range of motion with increasing angular velocity, especially when testing weak muscle groups. In high angular velocities this may become a problem since the limb may pass the optimal joint position for muscular performance, and the recorded peak torque may not represent the subject's maximal torque capacity.

[1]  A A Sapega,et al.  Muscle performance evaluation in orthopaedic practice. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  N. Mohtadi,et al.  Concentric and eccentric quadriceps torque in pre-adolescent males. , 1990, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[3]  D. Blanke,et al.  The reliability of two different cybex isokinetic systems. , 1990, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[4]  P. Kannus,et al.  Maximal Peak Torque as a Predictor of Peak Angular Impulse and Average Power of Thigh Muscles - An Isometric and Isokinetic Study , 1990, International journal of sports medicine.

[5]  P. Kannus,et al.  Prediction of torque acceleration energy and power of thigh muscles from peak torque. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  R. Robertson,et al.  Isokinetic testing in young nonathletic able-bodied subjects. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Seger,et al.  Eccentric and Concentric Torque-Velocity Characteristics, Torque Output Comparisons, and Gravity Effect Torque Corrections for the Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscles in Females , 1989, International journal of sports medicine.

[8]  L W Douglass,et al.  Reliability of an isokinetic test of muscle strength and endurance. , 1989, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[9]  J M Rothstein,et al.  Clinical uses of isokinetic measurements. Critical issues. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[10]  Kennon Francis,et al.  Comparison of Peak Torque Values of the Knee Flexor and Extensor Muscle Groups Using the Cybex II® and Lido 2.0® Isokinetic Dynamometers , 1987 .

[11]  H. Milner-Brown,et al.  Quantifying human muscle strength, endurance and fatigue. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  B. Skipper,et al.  Isokinetic muscle imbalance and knee-joint injuries. A prospective blind study. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  M. Wyatt,et al.  Comparison of Quadriceps and Hamstring Torque Values during lsokinetic Exercise. , 1981, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[14]  J. Hofkosh,et al.  A study of isokinetic exercise. , 1969, Physical therapy.

[15]  H J Hislop,et al.  The isokinetic concept of exercise. , 1967, Physical therapy.

[16]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[17]  M WILLIAMS,et al.  Strength variation through the range of joint motion. , 1959, The Physical therapy review.

[18]  D. Perrin Reliability of isokinetic measures , 1986 .

[19]  M. Fillyaw,et al.  Importance of correcting isokinetic peak torque for the effect of gravity when calculating knee flexor to extensor muscle ratios. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[20]  W. Dixon,et al.  BMDP statistical software , 1983 .

[21]  J J Knapik,et al.  Isokinetic and isometric torque relationships in the human body. , 1980, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  J. Charteris,et al.  Isokinetic dynamometry: normative data for clinical use in lower extremity (knee) cases. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Force-velocity relations and fiber composition in human knee extensor muscles. , 1976, Journal of applied physiology.