Research on the Effect of the New Environmental Protection Law on the Market Competitiveness of China’s Heavily Polluting Enterprises

Based on a difference-in-differences model, this study examines the effect of environmental regulation on the market competitiveness of heavily polluting enterprises, their mechanisms, and the space for effective implementation. Which all listed heavily polluting enterprises between 2010 and 2019 are included as the experimental group, and all other firms in the same industries listed on the Chinese stock market as the control group. The results indicate that environmental regulations have significantly increased the market competitiveness of heavily polluting enterprises in China. Furthermore, China’s New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) has improved the market competitiveness of heavily polluting enterprises through strategic, flexible mitigation effects. Finally, the NEPL in regions with eastern or non-state enterprises has a significant impact on market competitiveness. The government should further improve laws and regulations for environmental protection, increase environmental regulations, and apply policies based on the differences in heavily polluting enterprises.

[1]  Wugan Cai,et al.  How does environmental regulation influence enterprises’ total factor productivity? A quasi-natural experiment based on China’s new environmental protection law , 2020 .

[2]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  The effects of environmental regulation on outward foreign direct investment’s reverse green technology spillover: crowding out or facilitation? , 2020 .

[3]  Jianjun Lu,et al.  Analysis of the Social Welfare Effect of Environmental Regulation Policy Based on a Market Structure Perspective and Consumer , 2019, Sustainability.

[4]  Xunpeng Shi,et al.  Public appeal, environmental regulation and green investment: Evidence from China , 2018, Energy Policy.

[5]  A. Rathgeber,et al.  It is Merely a Matter of Time: A Meta-Analysis of the Causality between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance , 2018, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[6]  Erkan Bayraktar,et al.  How do integrated quality and environmental management practices affect firm performance? Mediating roles of quality performance and environmental proactivity , 2018, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[7]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Impact of environmental regulations on green technological innovative behavior: An empirical study in China , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Zhongju Liao.  Environmental policy instruments, environmental innovation and the reputation of enterprises , 2018 .

[9]  Yi-jun Yuan,et al.  Different Types of Environmental Regulations and Heterogeneous Influence on “Green” Productivity: Evidence from China , 2017 .

[10]  Rıfat Kamaşak,et al.  Importance of Strategic Flexibility on the Knowledge and Innovation Relationship: An Emerging Market Study☆ , 2016 .

[11]  Mitja Ruzzier,et al.  What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature , 2016 .

[12]  S. Zeng,et al.  The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical study in China. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Donald V. Moser,et al.  Managers’ Green Investment Disclosures and Investors’ Reaction , 2014 .

[14]  L. Liang,et al.  Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model , 2014 .

[15]  Nathan Y. Sharp,et al.  Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort , 2013 .

[16]  Heng Liu,et al.  Strategic Flexibility and International Venturing by Emerging Market Firms: The Moderating Effects of Institutional and Relational Factors , 2013 .

[17]  Paul Lanoie,et al.  Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis , 2011 .

[18]  Eva Horváthová,et al.  Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis , 2010 .

[19]  A. Blackman.  Alternative Pollution Control Policies in Developing Countries: Informal, Informational, and Voluntary , 2009 .

[20]  Mie Augier,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Alexander W. Butler,et al.  Does Access to External Finance Improve Productivity? Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 2009 .

[22]  Frédéric Warzynski,et al.  Markups and Firm-Level Export Status , 2009 .

[23]  Michel Patry,et al.  Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis , 2008 .

[24]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[25]  Ronald J. Shadbegian,et al.  Plant Vintage, Technology, and Environmental Regulation , 2001 .

[26]  Michael Schwarz,et al.  American Economic Association , 1891 .

[27]  Silvia Albrizio,et al.  Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms , 2017 .

[28]  Wang Ji.  Environmental Regulation and Enterprises' TFP——An Empirical Analysis Based on China's Industrial Enterprises Data , 2014 .

[29]  R. Elliott,et al.  Environmental Regulation Induced Foreign Direct Investment , 2013 .

[30]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  Beyond “Does it Pay to be Green?” A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP–CFP Relationship , 2013 .

[31]  W. Dong.  Porter Hypothesis,Environmental Regulation and Enterprises' Technological Innovation——The Comparative Analysis between Central China and Eastern China , 2011 .

[32]  Li Zhi.  Study on Path of Environmental Regulatory Policies to Enterprise Performance , 2011 .

[33]  Liu Zhi-biao.  Study on Relationship between Environmental Regulation and Firm Independently Innovation——The Firm Competitiveness Design Based on Porter Hypothesis , 2006 .