Characteristics of the extreme rainfall event and consequent flash floods in W Slovenia in September 2007

Abstract. During a weather front that passed over large parts of Slovenia on 18.9.2007, extreme rainfall events were triggered causing several severe flash floods with six casualties. Out of 210 municipalities in Slovenia, 60 were reporting flood damages, and the total economic flood damage was later estimated at close to 200 million Euro; highest damage was claimed by Železniki municipality in NW Slovenia. The main purpose of the study presented in this paper was to put together available meteorological and hydrological data in order to get better insight into temporal and spatial dynamics and variability of the flash flood event along the Selska Sora River flowing through the town of Železniki. The weather forecast by the Environmental Agency of the Republic of Slovenia (ARSO) lead to early warning of floodings but has underestimated rainfall amounts by a factor of 2. Also meteorological radar underestimated ground rainfall as much as by 50%. During that day, in many rainfall gauging stations operated by ARSO in the area under investigation, extreme rainfall amounts were measured, e.g. 303 mm in 24 h or 157 mm in 2 h. Some of the measured rainfall amounts were the highest registered amounts in Slovenia so far. Statistical analysis using Gumble distribution was performed and rainfall return periods were estimated. When assessing rainfall return periods, a question of the sampling error as a consequence of short rainfall records used was raised. Furthermore, measured rainfall data were used to reconstruct hydrographs on selected water stations along the Selska Sora River. The cumulative areal precipitation for the Selska Sora River catchment upstream of Železniki amounted to 219 mm, while the modeled effective precipitation used to simulate the hydrograph peak was only 57 mm. The modeled direct runoff coefficient therefore amounts to 0.26. Surprisingly low value is mainly caused by the applied unit hydrograph method that seeks to meet the peak discharge rather than hydrograph volume. However, the spatial distribution of the rainfall in the area was highly variable and present spatial positioning of rain gauges is obviously inadequate for proper representation of the actual spatial amount of rainfall. The study confirmed that post-flood investigation should focus on discharges and hydrological response of the catchment rather than simply analyzing statistical characteristics of rainfall.

[1]  Etienne Leblois,et al.  Visualization of storm severity , 2005 .

[2]  E. Caporali,et al.  Analysis of radar and raingauge measurements for a critical meteorological event in Tuscany , 1995 .

[3]  Scott M. Rochette,et al.  Initiation of an Elevated Mesoscale Convective System Associated with Heavy Rainfall , 1996 .

[4]  C. Chappell.  Quasi-Stationary Convective Events , 1986 .

[5]  Ying-Hwa Kuo,et al.  Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting: Report of the Eighth Prospectus Development Team, U.S. Weather Research Program , 1998 .

[6]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Post‐flood field investigations in upland catchments after major flash floods: proposal of a methodology and illustrations , 2008 .

[7]  B. Montz.  Assessing the Effects and Effectiveness of Flash Flood Mitigation Strategies , 2001 .

[8]  C. Chappell,et al.  Synoptic and Meso-α Scale Aspects of Flash Flood Events1 , 1979 .

[9]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Hydrological analysis of the river Aude, France, flash flood on 12 and 13 November 1999 , 2004 .

[10]  Mitja Brilly,et al.  Hydrologic conditions responsible for triggering the Stože landslide, Slovenia , 2004 .

[11]  Mary Lynn Baeck,et al.  Hydrologic analysis of the Fort Collins, Colorado, flash flood of 1997 , 2000 .

[12]  Marco Borga,et al.  Regional frequency analysis of extreme precipitation in the eastern Italian Alps and the August 29, 2003 flash flood , 2007 .

[13]  Céline Lutoff,et al.  Human exposure to flash floods – Relation between flood parameters and human vulnerability during a storm of September 2002 in Southern France , 2008 .

[14]  E. Caporali,et al.  Hydrometeorology of Flash Floods , 2001 .

[15]  M. Borga,et al.  Radar rainfall estimation for the post-event analysis of a Slovenian flash-flood case: application of the Mountain Reference Technique at C-band frequency , 2009 .

[16]  H. Michael Mogil,et al.  NWS's Flash Flood Warning and Disaster Preparedness Programs , 1978 .

[17]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  A Diagnostic Study of Three Heavy Precipitation Episodes in the Western Mediterranean Region , 1998 .

[18]  H. Andrieu,et al.  The Catastrophic Flash-Flood Event of 8–9 September 2002 in the Gard Region, France: A First Case Study for the Cévennes–Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological Observatory , 2005 .

[19]  Marco Borga,et al.  Hydrometeorological Analysis of the 29 August 2003 Flash Flood in the Eastern Italian Alps , 2007 .

[20]  Marco Borga,et al.  Radar hydrology modifies the monitoring of flash‐flood hazard , 2003 .

[21]  J. Costa,et al.  An Evaluation of Selected Extraordinary Floods in the United States Reported by the U.S. Geological Survey and Implications for Future Advancement of Flood Science , 2008 .

[22]  Konstantine P. Georgakakos,et al.  Analytical results for operational flash flood guidance , 2006 .

[23]  M. Borga,et al.  Flash flood warning based on rainfall thresholds and soil moisture conditions: An assessment for gauged and ungauged basins , 2008 .