Objective Assessment of Quality Measurement and Improvement

Abstract Accurate quality measurement that allows for and results in improvement is essential to colon and rectal surgery. Currently, no consensus exists as to which variables are most important in measuring outcomes. Debate continues concerning the “best” variables to measure from a structural, process, and outcomes standpoint. Although American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program provides an opportunity for outcomes measurement in general and vascular surgery, there is no specific quality improvement tool available for colon and rectal surgery. However, there is growing literature testing the validity of candidate variables to be used in such a data collection system. This article evaluates the current objective assessment measurements used for quality improvement in colon and rectal surgery.

[1]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[2]  L. Prasad,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Colon and Rectal Cancer , 2012, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  Renee Demski,et al.  Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  D. Flum,et al.  Routine leak testing in colorectal surgery in the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. , 2012, Archives of surgery.

[5]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Identification of Consensus-Based Quality End Points for Colorectal Surgery , 2012, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[6]  Terry Rogers,et al.  Creating a learning healthcare system in surgery: Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) at 5 years. , 2012, Surgery.

[7]  Lee A Fleisher,et al.  Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  Z. Cohen,et al.  Assessing outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer using quality of care indicators. , 2010, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[9]  M. Varma,et al.  An Increase in Compliance With the Surgical Care Improvement Project Measures Does Not Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[10]  C. Ko,et al.  Variability in Length of Stay After Colorectal Surgery: Assessment of 182 Hospitals in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[11]  A. Arriaga,et al.  The Better Colectomy Project: Association of Evidence-Based Best-Practice Adherence Rates to Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[12]  C. Ko,et al.  Does Surgical Quality Improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: An Evaluation of All Participating Hospitals , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[13]  C. Ko,et al.  Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  S. Sonnad,et al.  National Cancer Institute Designation Predicts Improved Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Surgery , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[15]  Karl Hammermeister,et al.  Successful Implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the Private Sector: The Patient Safety in Surgery Study , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[16]  A. Morris,et al.  Reoperation as a Quality Indicator in Colorectal Surgery: A Population-Based Analysis , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[17]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Development of quality indicators for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  D. Bratzler.  The Surgical Infection Prevention and Surgical Care Improvement Projects: Promises and Pitfalls , 2006, The American surgeon.

[19]  Adalsteinn D. Brown,et al.  Development of quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery, using a 3-step modified Delphi approach. , 2005, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[20]  Philip P Goodney,et al.  Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? , 2005, Cancer.

[21]  N. Hyman,et al.  Quality Assessment and Improvement in Colon and Rectal Surgery , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[22]  D. Prytherch,et al.  Development of a dedicated risk‐adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM) , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[23]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[24]  A. Renehan,et al.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[25]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[26]  F. Grover,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[27]  A. Morris,et al.  Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. , 2007, Archives of surgery.

[28]  J. Bartlett.  2004 Health Update #5: Surveillance for Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies, including the Classic and Variant Forms of Creutzfeld-Jakob Disease, in New York City , 2004 .

[29]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Leadership by example : coordinating government roles in improving health care quality , 2003 .

[30]  P. C. Weaver,et al.  POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. , 1998, The British journal of surgery.