Preliminary Study of Strong-Sludge Gas Retention and Release Mechanisms in Clay Simulants

The Hanford Site has 28 double-shell tanks (DSTs) and 149 single-shell tanks (SSTs) containing radioactive wastes that are complex mixes of radioactive and chemical products. The mission of the Department of Energy’s River Protection Project is to retrieve and treat the Hanford tank waste for disposal and close the tank farms. A key aspect of the mission is to retrieve and transfer waste from the SSTs, which are at greater risk for leaking, into DSTs for interim storage until the waste is transferred to and treated in the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant. There is, however, limited space in the existing DSTs to accept waste transfers from the SSTs, and approaches to overcoming the limited DST space will benefit the overall mission. The purpose of this study is to summarize and analyze the key previous experiment that forms the basis for the relaxed controls and to summarize initial progress and results on new experiments focused on understanding the conditions that result in low gas retention. The work is ongoing; this report provides a summary of the initial findings. The previous large-scale test used about 50 m3 of sediment, which would be unwieldy for doing multiple parametric experiments. Accordingly, experiments willmore » begin with smaller-scale tests to determine whether the desired mechanisms can be studied without the difficulty of conducting very large experiments.« less

[1]  P. R. Bredt,et al.  The effect of dilution on the gas retention behavior of Tank 241-SY- 103 waste , 1996 .

[2]  Jeromy Wj Jenks,et al.  The Disruption of Vessel-Spanning Bubbles with Sloped Fins in Flat-Bottom and 2:1 Elliptical-Bottom Vessels , 2010 .

[3]  Phillip A. Gauglitz,et al.  Mechanisms of gas retention and release: Experimental results for Hanford single-shell waste tanks 241-A-101, 241-S-106, and 241-U-103 , 1998 .

[4]  M. E. Brewster,et al.  In situ rheology and gas volume in Hanford double-shell waste tanks , 1996 .

[5]  Dawn M. Wellman,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Soluble Phosphate Amendments for the Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminants: Effect on Sediment Hydraulic Conductivity , 2006 .

[6]  S. Wheeler,et al.  Movement of large gas bubbles in unsaturated fine‐grained sediments , 1990 .

[7]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Computed tomography : fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications , 2000 .

[8]  P. J. Certa RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT SYSTEM PLAN , 2003 .

[9]  Phillip A. Gauglitz,et al.  A Discussion of SY-101 Crust Gas Retention and Release Mechanisms , 1999 .

[10]  Phillip A. Gauglitz,et al.  Gas bubble retention and its effect on waste properties: Retention mechanisms, viscosity, and tensile and shear strengths , 1995 .

[11]  D. P. Mendoza,et al.  Mechanisms of gas bubble retention , 1994 .

[12]  R. Chhabra,et al.  Bubbles, Drops, and Particles in Non-Newtonian Fluids , 2006 .

[13]  Herbert T. Schaef,et al.  Laboratory Testing of Bulk Vitrified and Steam Reformed Low-Activity Waste Forms to Support A Preliminary Risk Assessment for an Integrated Disposal Facility , 2003 .

[14]  R. Ketcham,et al.  Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications to the geosciences , 2001 .