Genetic Algorithm Based Construction-Conscious Minimum Weight Design of Seismic Steel Moment-Resisting Frames

The minimum weight criterion, which has been widely adopted in the literature for optimal design of steel structural systems, is inadequate to fully reflect the initial monetary investment due to lack of consideration of additional construction expenses resulting from varied degree of design complexity such as different member sections and splice/connection types. In this paper, design optimization of seismic steel moment-resisting frames involves simultaneous consideration of two competing objective functions: the steel material weight and an approximate measure of design complexity in terms of the number of different standard steel member section types. The code-compliant seismic structural design follows the equivalent lateral force procedure of the 2000 National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program seismic provisions in conjunction with American Institute of Steel Construction load resistance factor design seismic steel design criteria. A genetic algorithm is used for the posed biobjective structural optimization problem to produce a set of alternative designs establishing optimized trade-off between the two merit objectives. Numerical examples show that a minimum weight design with a balanced degree of design complexity is expected to achieve an initial investment economy with more accuracy.

[1]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[2]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  OPTIMUM DESIGN OF SPACE FRAMES UNDER SEISMIC LOADING , 2001 .

[3]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[4]  Shahram Pezeshk,et al.  Design of Nonlinear Framed Structures Using Genetic Optimization , 2000 .

[5]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  THEORETICAL AND NUMERICAL CONSTRAINT-HANDLING TECHNIQUES USED WITH EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS: A SURVEY OF THE STATE OF THE ART , 2002 .

[6]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Optimal Steel Frame Design by Simulated Annealing , 1991 .

[7]  M. S. Hayalioglu Optimum load and resistance factor design of steel space frames using genetic algorithm , 2001 .

[8]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[9]  F. Cheng,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Design with Pareto Genetic Algorithm , 1997 .

[10]  G. Winter,et al.  Optimising frame structures by different strategies of genetic algorithms , 2001 .

[11]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Biologically inspired soft computing methods in structural mechanics and engineering , 2001 .

[12]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems (Genetic and Evolutionary Computation) , 2006 .

[13]  Min Liu,et al.  Optimal seismic design of steel frame buildings based on life cycle cost considerations , 2003 .

[14]  Barry Hilary Valentine Topping,et al.  Improved genetic operators for structural engineering optimization , 1998 .

[15]  Christopher M. Foley,et al.  Automated Design of Steel Frames Using Advanced Analysis and Object-Oriented Evolutionary Computation , 2003 .

[16]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[17]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[18]  Shahram Pezeshk,et al.  Design of framed structures: an integrated non‐linear analysis and optimal minimum weight design , 1998 .

[19]  Ali M. Memari,et al.  Optimal design of steel frames subject to gravity and seismic codes' prescribed lateral forces , 1999 .

[20]  Kamal C. Sarma Fuzzy discrete multicriteria cost optimization of steel structures using genetic algorithm , 2000 .

[21]  Lei Xu,et al.  Alternative methods for the optimal design of slender steel frameworks , 1992 .