Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation.

Human transcallosal responses (TCRs) were elicited by focal magnetic coil (MC) stimulation of homologous sites in contralateral frontal cortex and compared with those to focal anodic stimulation. With MC stimulation, the TCR consisted of an initially positive wave with an onset latency of 8.8-12.2 msec, a duration of 7-15 msec, and an amplitude which reached up to 20 microV, sometimes followed by a broad low amplitude negative wave. With anodic stimulation, a similar response was obtained in which the positive wave was similar in latency and maximum amplitude, but had a greater duration. With anodic stimulation, not only was the TCR threshold below that for contralateral movement, but it reached substantial size at intensities below motor threshold. With MC stimulation, contralateral arm movement and scalp corticomotor potentials were observed when the MC was displaced posteriorly towards the central sulcus. Unlike with anodic stimulation, the MC evoked TCR was usually not preceded by a prominent EMG potential from temporalis muscle and was not associated with subject discomfort. The TCR provides unique information concerning the functional integrity of callosal projection neurons, their axons and transsynaptic processes in recipient cortex. This information may prove useful in the evaluation of intrinsic cerebral mechanisms and in establishing cortical viability.

[1]  H. Curtis INTERCORTICAL CONNECTIONS OF CORPUS CALLOSUM AS INDICATED BY EVOKED POTENTIALS , 1940 .

[2]  J. Andreassi,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the visual cortical evoked potential as a function of stimulus location. , 1975, Psychophysiology.

[3]  R. Bickford,et al.  Somatomotor and Somatosensory: Median Nerve Stimulation in Man , 1968 .

[4]  S P Wise,et al.  Commissural columns in the sensory‐motor cortex of monkeys , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  H. T. Chang,et al.  Cortical response to activity of callosal neurons. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  P. Rossini,et al.  Mechanisms of nervous propagation along central motor pathways: noninvasive evaluation in healthy subjects and in patients with neurological disease. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[7]  V. Amassian,et al.  Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  H. Morton,et al.  Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject , 1980, Nature.

[9]  H. Shibasaki,et al.  Electroencephalographic studies myoclonus. , 1978, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  Physiologic analysis of the myoclonus of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[11]  W. Nauta,et al.  Columnar distribution of cortico-cortical fibers in the frontal association, limbic, and motor cortex of the developing rhesus monkey , 1977, Brain Research.

[12]  V E Amassian,et al.  Human cerebral cortical responses to contralateral transcranial stimulation. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[13]  J TOMASCH,et al.  Size, distribution, and number of fibres in the human Corpus Callosum , 1954, The Anatomical record.

[14]  E D Adrian,et al.  The spread of activity in the cerebral cortex , 1936, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  R. Keyes Nerve conduction studies and electromyography. , 1990, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[16]  H. Shibasaki,et al.  Electroencephalographic studies of myoclonus. Myoclonus-related cortical spikes and high amplitude somatosensory evoked potentials , 1978 .

[17]  K. Mills,et al.  Magnetic and electrical transcranial brain stimulation: physiological mechanisms and clinical applications. , 1987, Neurosurgery.