Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia

Identification of the causes underlying the under-representation of women and minorities in academia is a source of ongoing concern and controversy. This is a critical issue in ensuring the openness and diversity of academia; yet differences in personal experiences and interpretations have mired it in controversy. We construct a simple model of the academic career that can be used to identify general trends, and separate the demographic effects of historical differences from ongoing biological or cultural gender differences. We apply the model to data on academics collected by the National Science Foundation (USA) over the past three decades, across all of science and engineering, and within six disciplines (agricultural and biological sciences, engineering, mathematics and computer sciences, physical sciences, psychology, and social sciences). We show that the hiring and retention of women in academia have been affected by both demographic inertia and gender differences, but that the relative influence of gender differences appears to be dwindling for most disciplines and career transitions. Our model enables us to identify the two key non-structural bottlenecks restricting female participation in academia: choice of undergraduate major and application to faculty positions. These transitions are those in greatest need of detailed study and policy development.

[1]  S. Ceci,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Sex Differences in Math-intensive Fields on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[2]  Jo Handelsman,et al.  More Women in Science , 2005, Science.

[3]  R. Steinpreis,et al.  The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study , 1999 .

[4]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Increased Frequency and Duration of the Postdoctorate Career Stage , 2005 .

[5]  P Lieb,et al.  Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[7]  O. Cohen-Fix,et al.  Falling off the academic bandwagon , 2007, EMBO reports.

[8]  M. Faculty,et al.  Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty , 2010 .

[9]  Sari M. van Anders.  Why the Academic Pipeline Leaks: Fewer Men than Women Perceive Barriers to Becoming Professors , 2004 .

[10]  Donna J. Nelson,et al.  A NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIVERSITY IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FACULTIES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES , 2005 .

[11]  Laraine T. Zappert,et al.  In the pipeline , 1985 .

[12]  Aaup.  Policy Documents and Reports , 2001 .

[13]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  C. Hill,et al.  Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. , 2010 .

[15]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Carolyn E. Psenka,et al.  Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty , 2003 .

[17]  Demographic Inertia and Women's Representation Among Faculty in Higher Education , 2002 .

[18]  S. Laursen,et al.  Demographic Inertia Revisited: An Immodest Proposal to Achieve Equitable Gender Representation among Faculty in Higher Education , 2007 .

[19]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Paola Sapienza,et al.  Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  E. Henttonen,et al.  Women in Science. Career processes and Outcomes , 2004 .

[23]  A Deborah,et al.  National Science Foundation, Div. of Science Resources , 2000 .

[24]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[25]  Mary Ann Mason,et al.  Problems in the Pipeline: Gender, Marriage, and Fertility in the Ivory Tower , 2008 .