Peripheral artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis analysis in 16-row computed tomography: an in-vitro evaluation

The accuracy of 16-row multidetector CT in the visualization of different peripheral artery stents and in the appraisal of in-stent stenosis was assessed. Nine different stent types (nitinol and stainless steel) with three diameters (6, 8 and 10 mm) were used; altogether 27 stents were analyzed in a barrel-shaped vascular model. Low-grade (<40%) and high-grade (>60%) in-stent stenoses were simulated by polyurethane sticks (70 HU) of differing diameters (2–6 mm). Imaging was performed with 16×0.75-mm detector collimation, 130 mAs, 120 kV, 12-mm table feed/rotation, 1.0-mm slice thickness and 0.5-mm increment. The stent diameter, strut thickness, in-stent attenuation values, degree and degree of in-stent stenosis were evaluated. Nitinol stents showed significantly (P<10−6) less stent lumen narrowing, artificial strut thickening and overestimation of the degree of in-stent stenoses than stainless steel stents. In-stent attenuation values and artificial strut thickening were significantly (P<10−6) lower in 10- and 8-mm stents than in 6-mm stents. Stent lumen narrowing was significantly less in 10-mm stents than in 8-mm (P<10−4) or 6-mm (P<10−6) stents. In-stent stenoses were significantly overestimated, irrespective of the stent diameter. In 6-mm stents overestimation was significantly higher than in 8-mm (P<0.01) or 10-mm stents (P<10−6). Under in-vitro conditions 16-row MDCT allowed an accurate identification of in-stent stenosis, but significantly overestimated the effective degree of the stenosis.

[1]  Heutiger Stand und zukünftige Entwicklungen in der Mehrschichtcomputertomographie , 2004, Der Radiologe.

[2]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  Diagnostic Value of Spiral-CT Angiography in Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography Before and After Peripheral Vascular Intervention , 1998, Angiology.

[4]  S Schaller,et al.  [Current status and future potentials of multislice computed tomography]. , 2004, Der Radiologe.

[5]  D Maintz,et al.  Multislice CT angiography of the iliac arteries in the presence of various stents: in vitro evaluation of artifacts and lumen visibility. , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Shoki Takahashi,et al.  MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Leo P Lawler,et al.  Multidetector row computed tomography of the aorta and peripheral arteries. , 2003, Cardiology clinics.

[8]  W. Heindel,et al.  Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Ahuva Engel,et al.  Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Klaus Sartor,et al.  Small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro evaluation of in-stent stenoses using CT angiography , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[11]  M. Völk,et al.  Appearance of Vascular Stents in Computed Tomographic Angiography: In Vitro Examination of 14 Different Stent Types , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Rüdiger Blindt,et al.  Coronary Artery Stents in Multislice Computed Tomography: In Vitro Artifact Evaluation , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Walter Heindel,et al.  Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation , 2003, European Radiology.