The effect of mere presence on social facilitation: An unobtrusive test

Abstract An unobstrusive experimental manipulation was used to test the hypothesis that the mere presence of others can influence an individual's performance. A task was employed for which there were no clear performance criteria, and which was very unlikely to engender evaluation aprehension. Performance times on this task (dressing and undressing in familiar and unfamiliar clothing) were compared for subjects working alone, in the presence of a passive inattentive person, and in the presence of an attentive spectator. In contrast with the Alone condition, both social conditions (Audience and Incidental Audience) enhanced performance on the well-learned aspects of the task (dressing and undressing with one's own clothing) and hindered performance on the more complex aspects (working with unfamiliar clothing). It is concluded that the mere presence of others is a sufficient condition for social facilitation and social interference effects.

[1]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Anticipated evaluation and audience presence in the enhancement of dominant responses , 1971 .

[2]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social facilitation and imitation in group risk-taking , 1970 .

[3]  D. C. Glass,et al.  Evaluation apprehension and the social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Effect on performance of learning a complex motor task in the presence of spectators. , 1969, Research quarterly.

[5]  J. Haas,et al.  Effect of evaluative others upon learning and performance of a complex motor task. , 1975, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  R. H. Rittle,et al.  Enhancement of Response Rate by the Mere Physical Presence of the Experimenter , 1976 .

[7]  R. Zajonc.  SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[8]  P. Marchand.  La coprésence passive et la performance motrice , 1976 .

[9]  Jerry L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of audience status, evaluation, and time of action on performance with hidden-word problems. , 1973 .

[10]  Joseph Sasfy,et al.  Form of evaluation and audience expertness as joint determinants of audience effects , 1974 .

[11]  Joseph M. Hillery,et al.  Social Facilitation in a Coaction Setting: An Examination of the Effects Over Learning Trials. , 1973 .

[12]  A. Chapman.  An electromyographic study of social facilitation: a test of the 'mere presence' hypothesis. , 1974, British journal of psychology.

[13]  R. Geen,et al.  Drive Theory of Social Facilitation: Twelve Years of Theory and Research , 1977 .

[14]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  The motivating effects of distraction on task performance. , 1975 .

[15]  S. Duval,et al.  A theory of objective self awareness , 1972 .

[16]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses , 1966 .

[17]  John Innes,et al.  The effect of presence of an audience, evaluation apprehension and objective self-awareness on learning , 1975 .

[18]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.