How effective are small-scale energy interventions in developing countries? Results from a post-evaluation on project-level

In many developing countries large parts of the population are negatively affected by the lack of access to clean and affordable energy. Providing sustainable energy services to these people has been acknowledged as a key component to reduce poverty. One form of development assistance to address the needs of the energy-poor at the local level are small-scale renewable energy projects. Like all development interventions, these energy projects are not intended to produce short-term outputs, but to create long-term impacts. Thus, it has become increasingly important to evaluate and accurately assess their sustainability. But despite the widely recognized need to identify successes factors and explain failure only few studies exist that address the sustainability of small-scale of energy development efforts post implementation. Against this background the paper presents the results of a post-evaluation of 23 projects supported via the Sustainable Energy Project Support (SEPS) scheme of the WISIONS initiative run by the Wuppertal Institute. The analysis provides insights on the influence that socio-economic, environmental, geographic and gender factors can have on the sustainability of small-scale renewable energy projects in developing countries.

[1]  T. Nakata,et al.  Design of decentralized energy systems for rural electrification in developing countries considering regional disparity , 2012 .

[2]  J. Baker Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners , 2000 .

[3]  Jingyi Han,et al.  Small-scale bioenergy projects in rural China: Lessons to be learnt , 2008 .

[4]  G. Hong,et al.  Sustainability assessment of renewable energy projects for off-grid rural electrification: The Pangan-an Island case in the Philippines , 2012 .

[5]  Y. Lambrou,et al.  ENERGY AND GENDER ISSUES IN RURAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[6]  Laia Ferrer-Martí,et al.  Evaluating and comparing three community small-scale wind electrification projects , 2012 .

[7]  Elisabeth Ilskog,et al.  And then they lived sustainably ever after?--Assessment of rural electrification cases by means of indicators , 2008 .

[8]  Shikun Cheng,et al.  Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal. , 2014 .

[9]  R. Mohideen,et al.  The implications of clean and renewable energy development for gender equality in poor communities in South Asia , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Technology and Society in Asia (T&SA).

[10]  Rodolfo Dufo-López,et al.  Tecno-economic assessment of an off-grid PV-powered community kitchen for developing regions , 2012 .

[11]  Elizabeth Cecelski,et al.  The Role of Women in Sustainable Energy Development , 2000 .

[12]  Gunnar Köhlin,et al.  Energy, Gender and Development: What are the Linkages? Where is the Evidence? , 2011 .

[13]  Elisabeth Ilskog,et al.  Indicators for assessment of rural electrification--An approach for the comparison of apples and pears , 2008 .

[14]  Getachew Bekele,et al.  Feasibility Study of Small Hydro/PV/Wind Hybrid System for off Grid Rural Electrification in Ethiopia , 2012 .

[15]  Jennifer N. Brass,et al.  Power for Development: A Review of Distributed Generation Projects in the Developing World , 2012 .