Rapid Microwave Design Optimization in Frequency Domain Using Adaptive Response Scaling

In this paper, a novel methodology for cost-efficient microwave design optimization in the frequency domain is proposed. Our technique, referred to as adaptive response scaling (ARS), has been developed for constructing a fast replacement model (surrogate) of the high-fidelity electromagnetic-simulated model of the microwave structure under design using its equivalent circuit (low-fidelity model). The basic principle of ARS is a nonlinear frequency and amplitude response scaling aimed at accommodating the discrepancies between the low- and high-fidelity models at the reference design and, subsequently, at tracking the low-fidelity model changes that occur during the optimization run. The surrogate model prediction is obtained by applying appropriately composed scaling functions to the high-fidelity model at the reference design. ARS is a parameterless and simple-to-implement method that can be applied to a wide range of microwave structures. The ARS surrogate features excellent generalization capability that translates into improved reliability and reduced design cost. It is demonstrated using an eighth-order microstrip bandpass filter and a miniaturized rat-race coupler. Comparison with several space mapping algorithms is provided. The numerical results are supplemented by measurements of the fabricated optimum designs of the considered structures.

[1]  Chao-Hsiung Tseng,et al.  Compact Rat-Race Coupler Using Shunt-Stub-Based Artificial Transmission Lines , 2008, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters.

[2]  J. Bandler,et al.  Constrained parameter extraction for microwave design optimisation using implicit space mapping , 2011 .

[3]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Cognition-Driven Formulation of Space Mapping for Equal-Ripple Optimization of Microwave Filters , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[4]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Simulation-Driven Design Optimization and Modeling for Microwave Engineering , 2013 .

[6]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Reliable Microwave Modeling by Means of Variable-Fidelity Response Features , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[7]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Tuning space mapping: The state of the art , 2012 .

[8]  Lukasz Szydlowski,et al.  Zero-Pole Space Mapping for CAD of Filters , 2014, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters.

[9]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space mapping: the state of the art , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[10]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Simulation-Driven Design by Knowledge-Based Response Correction Techniques , 2016 .

[11]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Reliable Space-Mapping Optimization Integrated With EM-Based Adjoint Sensitivities , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[12]  Vicente E. Boria,et al.  Design of Planar Wideband Bandpass Filters From Specifications Using a Two-Step Aggressive Space Mapping (ASM) Optimization Algorithm , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[13]  D. Echeverr,et al.  SPACE MAPPING AND DEFECT CORRECTION , 2005 .

[14]  S. Koziel,et al.  Space-Mapping Optimization With Adaptive Surrogate Model , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[15]  S Koziel,et al.  Shape-Preserving Response Prediction for Microwave Design Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[16]  Raino A. E. Mäkinen,et al.  Gradient based antenna shape optimization using spline curves , 2010 .

[17]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Antenna Design by Simulation-Driven Optimization , 2014 .

[18]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Implicit space mapping optimization exploiting preassigned parameters , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[19]  R.J. Wenzel,et al.  Fast analysis and optimization of combline filters using FEM , 2001, 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Sympsoium Digest (Cat. No.01CH37157).

[20]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Expedited Geometry Scaling of Compact Microwave Passives by Means of Inverse Surrogate Modeling , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[21]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Fast simulation-driven feature-based design optimization of compact dual-band microstrip branch-line coupler , 2016 .

[22]  J.E. Rayas-Sanchez,et al.  EM-based optimization of microwave circuits using artificial neural networks: the state-of-the-art , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[23]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space Mapping With Adaptive Response Correction for Microwave Design Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[24]  S. Koziel,et al.  Space mapping , 2008, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[25]  Natalia K. Nikolova,et al.  Theory of self-adjoint S-parameter sensitivities for lossless non-homogenous transmission-line modelling problems , 2008 .

[26]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Towards a rigorous formulation of the space mapping technique for engineering design , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[27]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Model management for cost-efficient surrogate-based optimisation of antennas using variable-fidelity electromagnetic simulations , 2012 .

[28]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Quality assessment of coarse models and surrogates for space mapping optimization , 2008 .

[29]  Qi-Jun Zhang,et al.  Evolutionary Neuro-Space Mapping Technique for Modeling of Nonlinear Microwave Devices , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[30]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[31]  C. R. Deboor,et al.  A practical guide to splines , 1978 .