Sets with incomplete and missing data — NN radar signal classification

We investigate further the problem of radar signal classification and source identification with neural networks. The available large dataset includes pulse train characteristics such as signal frequencies, type of modulation, pulse repetition intervals, scanning type, scan period, etc., represented as a mixture of continuous, discrete and categorical data. Typically, considerable part of the data samples is with missing values. In our previous work we used only part of the radar dataset, applying listwise deletion to get rid of the samples with missing values and processed relatively small subset of complete data. In this work we apply multiple imputation (MI) method, which is a model based approach of dealing with missing data, by producing confidence intervals for unbiased estimates without loss of statistical power (using both complete and incomplete cases). We employ MI to all data samples with up to 60% missingness, this way increasing more than twice the size of the initially used data subset. We apply feedforward backpropagation neural network (NN) supervised learning for solving the classification and identification problem and investigate and critically compare the same three case studies, researched in the previous paper and report improved, superior results, which is a consequence of the implemented MI and improved NN training.

[1]  Sabrina Eberhart,et al.  Applied Missing Data Analysis , 2016 .

[2]  Zhutian Yang,et al.  A study on radar emitter recognition based on spds neural network , 2011 .

[3]  Chin-Teng Lin,et al.  A vector neural network for emitter identification , 2002 .

[4]  Guo Wei,et al.  A new radar emitter recognition method based on pulse sample figure , 2011, 2011 Eighth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD).

[5]  N. K. Ibrahim,et al.  Artificial neural network approach in radar target classification , 2009 .

[6]  Nedyalko Petrov,et al.  Radar Emitter Signals Recognition and Classification with Feedforward Networks , 2013, KES.

[7]  N. V. S. N. Sarma,et al.  Identification of LPI Radar signals by higher order spectra and neural network techniques , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Electronic Design.

[8]  You He,et al.  Study on radar emitter recognition signal based on rough sets and RBF neural network , 2009, International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing.

[9]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  An introduction to modern missing data analyses. , 2010, Journal of school psychology.

[10]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data: Little/Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 2002 .

[11]  Mark A. Richards,et al.  Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing , 2005 .

[12]  Peter Goos,et al.  Sequential imputation for missing values , 2007, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[13]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[14]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A What-and-Where fusion neural network for recognition and tracking of multiple radar emitters , 2001, Neural Networks.

[15]  D. Curtis Schleher,et al.  Electronic Warfare in the Information Age , 1999 .

[16]  “ Multiple Imputation in Practice : Comparison of Software Packages for Regression Models With Missing Variables , ” , 2002 .

[17]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Underwater target classification using wavelet packets and neural networks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[18]  J. Graham,et al.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.