Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) uses low-frequency current and voltage measurements made on the boundary of a body to compute the conductivity distribution within the body. Since the permittivity distribution inside the body also contributes significantly to the measured voltages, the present reconstruction algorithm images complex conductivity distributions. A finite element model (FEM) is used to solve the forward problem, using a 6017-node mesh for a piecewise-linear potential distribution. The finite element solution using this mesh is compared with the analytical solution for a homogeneous field and a maximum error of 0.05% is observed in the voltage distribution. The boundary element method (BEM) is also used to generate the voltage data for inhomogeneous conductivity distributions inside regions with noncircular boundaries. An iterative reconstruction algorithm is described for approximating both the conductivity and permittivity distributions from this data. The results for an off-centered inhomogeneity showed a 35% improvement in contrast from that seen with only one iteration, for both the conductivity and the permittivity values. It is also shown that a significant improvement in images results from accurately modeling a noncircular boundary. Both static and difference images are distorted by assuming a circular boundary and the amount of distortion increases significantly as the boundary shape becomes more elliptical. For a homogeneous field in an elliptical body with axis ratio of 0.73, an image reconstructed assuming the boundary to be circular has an artifact at the center of the image with an error of 20%. This error increased to 37% when the axis ratio was 0.64. A reconstruction algorithm which used a mesh with the same axis ratio as the elliptical boundary reduced the error in the conductivity values to within 0.5% of the actual values.

[1]  Andy Adler,et al.  Experimental evaluation of two iterative reconstruction methods for induced current electrical impedance tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  G.J. Saulnier,et al.  A real-time electrical impedance tomograph , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Tadakuni Murai,et al.  Electrical Impedance Computed Tomography Based on a Finite Element Model , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Use of the Finite Element Method to Determine Epicardial from Body Surface Potentials Under a Realistic Torso Model , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  A. Pullan A high-order coupled finite element/boundary element torso model , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  Comparing Reconstruction Algorithms for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[8]  D. Isaacson Distinguishability of Conductivities by Electric Current Computed Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  David C. Dobson Estimates on resolution and stabilization for the linearized inverse conductivity problem , 1992 .

[10]  Toshimitsu Musha,et al.  Electric Dipole Tracing in the Brain by Means of the Boundary Element Method and Its Accuracy , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  R.S. MacLeod,et al.  Computer Models For Calculating Transthoracic Current Flow , 1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991.

[12]  Mary N. Morrow,et al.  A Comparison of Finite Element and Integral Equation Formulations for the Calculation of Electrocardiographic Potentials , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  M. Lynn,et al.  The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology. II. Numerical solution of the integral equations. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[14]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  G. Steven Gipson Boundary Element Fundamentals: Basic Concepts and Recent Developments in the Poisson Equation , 1987 .

[16]  J. S. Linder,et al.  Applications of Linear Graph Theory to Lumped Models of Solid-State Devices , 1970 .

[17]  G.J. Saulnier,et al.  An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  I. Duff,et al.  Direct Methods for Sparse Matrices , 1987 .

[19]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  A robust image reconstruction algorithm and its parallel implementation in electrical impedance tomography , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  B.H. Brown,et al.  A real-time electrical impedance tomography system for clinical use-design and preliminary results , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.