Effects of Type of Packaging Material on Postharvest Storage Quality of ‘Okubao’ Peach Fruit

The goal of this study was to compare the effects of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), on the quality of ‘Okubao’ peach fruit. After harvest, peaches were subjected to MAP treatments by using 35 um antifogging cast polypropylene (CPP), 30 um polyethylene (PE) and 88 um antibacterial film and then kept at 0±0.1°C and 90±5% for 49 days, while peaches stored for 35 days with unpackaged as control (CK). Physical and chemical changes [woolliness incidence, weight loss, healthy fruit index, color, flesh firmness, soluble solids contents (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), ascorbic acid, ethylene production and respiration rate, activities of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD)] were recorded at harvest and every 7 days of storage. Fruit flesh firmness significantly decreased during storage for all treated fruits while MAP maintained firmer than control. Compared with CK, MAP-stored fruits showed significantly reduced incidence of woolliness and PPO, POD activities, as well as higher hue angles, SSC, TA, ascorbic acid contents and lower ethylene production and respiration rates. Peach could be stored for 28 days and 35 days by PE and antibacterial film, respectively, while stored successfully for up to 42 days using the CPP material. Peaches stored in CK maintained marketable for 21days. These results showed that MAP resulted in a considerable improvement in keeping postharvest quality and providing longer storage, while CPP exerted the best effect.

[1]  M. Cantwell,et al.  Acceptable Cooling Delays for Selected Warm Season Vegetables and Melons , 2012 .

[2]  Chen Yihui Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene(1-MCP)Treatment on Postharvest Physiology and Quality of'Younai'Fruits , 2012 .

[3]  Yuan Jing-fen Effect of Different Film Packaging on Quality of "Yulu" Juicy Peaches during Cold Storage , 2011 .

[4]  M. A. Nobile,et al.  Effects of passive and active modified atmosphere packaging conditions on ready-to-eat table grape , 2011 .

[5]  Sandhya. Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: Current status and future needs , 2010 .

[6]  S. Tian,et al.  Crucial contribution of membrane lipids’ unsaturation to acquisition of chilling-tolerance in peach fruit stored at 0 °С , 2009 .

[7]  V. Rizzo,et al.  Effects of packaging on shelf life of fresh celery , 2009 .

[8]  Rui Hai Liu,et al.  Harvest maturity, storage temperature and relative humidity affect fruit quality, antioxidant contents and activity, and inhibition of cell proliferation of strawberry fruit , 2008 .

[9]  Nathalie Gontard,et al.  Effect of passive and active modified atmosphere packaging on quality changes of fresh endives , 2008 .

[10]  R. E. Henriod,et al.  Postharvest characteristics of navel oranges following high humidity and low temperature storage and transport , 2006 .

[11]  C. Crisosto,et al.  Understanding Tree Fruit Quality Based on Consumer Acceptance , 2006 .

[12]  C. Crisosto,et al.  Relationship between ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC) and consumer acceptance of high and low acid melting flesh peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) cultivars , 2005 .

[13]  C. Crisosto,et al.  Chilling injury in peach and nectarine , 2005 .

[14]  S. Tian,et al.  EFFECTS OF HIGH OXYGEN CONCENTRATION ON PRO-AND ANTI-OXIDANT ENZYMES IN PEACH FRUITS DURING POSTHARVEST PERIODS , 2005 .

[15]  Z. Min Effect of Different Thickness Films on the Quality of Modified Atmosphere Packaging Honey Peaches during the Storage , 2005 .

[16]  Lieng-Hong Chin,et al.  Low temperature storage and modified atmosphere packaging of carambola fruit and their effects on ripening related texture changes, wall modification and chilling injury symptoms , 2004 .

[17]  R. Porat,et al.  Reduction of postharvest rind disorders in citrus fruit by modified atmosphere packaging , 2004 .

[18]  Dou Shi-juan Storage Effects and Its Biochemistry Mechanisms of Different Package Treatments on Peach Fruits , 2003 .

[19]  A. Waterhouse,et al.  HPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches, and plums. , 2001, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[20]  R. Ben-arie,et al.  Modified atmosphere and modified humidity packaging alleviates chilling injury symptoms in mango fruit , 2000 .

[21]  C. Crisosto,et al.  Susceptibility to Chilling Injury of Peach, Nectarine, and Plum Cultivars Grown in California , 1999 .

[22]  H. A. Sundell,et al.  MAP of highbush blueberries: sensory quality in relation to storage temperature, film type and initial high oxygen atmosphere , 1999 .

[23]  A. Cano,et al.  Physiological changes in peaches related to chilling injury and ripening , 1998 .

[24]  S. Gillies,et al.  Cooling Method Influences the Postharvest Quality of Broccoli , 1995 .

[25]  Steven A. Sargent,et al.  Effects of delays to cooling and wrapping on strawberry quality (cv. Sweet Charlie) , 1995 .

[26]  G. King,et al.  Postharvest physiology of peaches and nectarines , 1989 .

[27]  E. Maxie,et al.  Cold storage effects on fresh market peaches, nectarines & plums estimating freezing points using low temperatures to delay internal breakdown , 1974 .