In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires.

INTRODUCTION The exact composition and material properties of the metal alloys used in orthodontics are usually not identified by or even available from manufacturers. This makes meaningful comparisons between wires impossible and is unacceptable with regard to biocompatibility issues. The aim of this study was to investigate the material characteristics of contemporary stainless steel (SS) and beta-titanium (beta-Ti) wires, also known as titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA), for comparison. METHODS Twenty-two different SS and beta-Ti wires, preferably straight wires sized 0.43 x 0.64 mm, (0.017 x 0.025 in) were tested blindly for wire dimensions, chemical compositions, bending and tensile properties, and surface characteristics. RESULTS Four chemical compositions were found for the beta-Ti wires: titanium-11.5, molybdenum-6, zirconium-4.5 tin; titanium-3, aluminum-8, vanadium-6, chromium-4, molybdenum-4, zirconium; titanium-6, aluminum-4, vanadium, and titanium-45 niobium. The SS wires were of AISI type 304 or the nickel-free variant BioDur 108. All beta-Ti wires showed high surface roughness values. TMA 02 significantly had the highest E-modulus, TMA 02 and TMA 11 had the highest 0.2% yield strength, TMA 02 had the highest hardness, and TMA 12 was the most ductile wire of the beta-Ti wires. All SS wires showed high 0.2% yield strength, SS 10 significantly had the lowest E-modulus and was the most ductile wire, and SS 08 significantly showed the lowest hardness values of all SS wires. CONCLUSIONS Significant differences were found between SS and beta-Ti wires, but there was little or no difference between the mechanical and physical characteristics tested in each subgroup. However, the morphological analysis clearly demonstrated that the finishing phase (annealing, polishing) of the wires' production process lacks the quality one would expect with regard to good mechanical properties and biocompatibility issues. Accurate specifications are urgently needed concerning the quality of orthodontic wires on the market.

[1]  A. J. Goldberg,et al.  Status Report on Beta Titanium Orthodontic Wires , 1982 .

[2]  S. Kapila,et al.  Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  T. Meling,et al.  On bracket slot height: a methodologic study. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  T. Eliades,et al.  Materials-induced variation in the torque expression of preadjusted appliances. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  T. Eliades,et al.  Orthodontic Materials Scientific And Clinical Aspects , 2006 .

[6]  D C Tidy,et al.  Frictional forces in fixed appliances. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  R. Kusy.  On the use of nomograms to determine the elastic property ratios of orthodontic arch wires. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[8]  Siatkowski Re.  Loss of anterior torque control due to variations in bracket slot and archwire dimensions. , 1999 .

[9]  Earl Johnson.  Relative stiffness of beta titanium archwires. , 2003, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  Joseph R. Davis.  Handbook of Materials for Medical Devices , 2003 .

[11]  Kevin Mendes,et al.  Friction: validation of manufacturer’s claim , 2003 .

[12]  R. Kusy,et al.  Geometric and material parameters of a nickel-titanium and a beta titanium orthodontic arch wire alloy. , 1987, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  R. Kusy.  Orthodontic biomaterials: from the past to the present. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[14]  C J Burstone,et al.  Production of low-friction and colored TMA by ion implantation. , 1995, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[15]  T. Eliades,et al.  Surface characterization of retrieved NiTi orthodontic archwires. , 2000, European journal of orthodontics.

[16]  F. Auricchio,et al.  Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  D. Wayne,et al.  Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires in tension, bending, and torsion. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[18]  W. Brantley,et al.  Comparison of bending and tension tests for orthodontic wires. , 1986, American journal of orthodontics.

[19]  R. Kusy,et al.  Comparison of the elastic properties of nickel-titanium and beta titanium arch wires. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  C. Burstone,et al.  An Evaluation of Beta Titanium Alloys for Use in Orthodontic Appliances , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[21]  A. J. Goldberg,et al.  Beta titanium: a new orthodontic alloy. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[22]  H. E. Boyer,et al.  Metals handbook; desk edition , 1985 .

[23]  B K Moore,et al.  A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire. , 1986, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  A. J. Goldberg,et al.  Alternative beta-titanium alloys for orthodontic wires. , 1987, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[25]  R. Kusy.  Comparison of nickel-titanium and beta titanium wire sizes to conventional orthodontic arch wire materials. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[26]  R S Nanda,et al.  Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[27]  M. Es‐Souni,et al.  On the In Vitro Biocompatibility of Elgiloy®, a Co-based Alloy, Compared to Two Titanium Alloys , 2003, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[28]  T. Eliades,et al.  2 Mechanics and Mechanical Testing of Orthodontic Materials , 2001 .

[29]  K.H.J. Buschow,et al.  Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology , 2004 .

[30]  C. Stephens,et al.  The characterization of arch wires for the initial alignment of irregular teeth. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[31]  B. Melsen,et al.  Titanium-niobium, a new finishing wire alloy. , 2000, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[32]  E. Collings,et al.  Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys , 1994 .

[33]  R S Nanda,et al.  Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[34]  M. Donovan,et al.  Weldability of beta titanium arch wires. , 1984, American Journal of Orthodontics.

[35]  R. Kusy,et al.  Frictional coefficients of ion-implanted alumina against ion-implanted beta-titanium in the low load, low velocity, single pass regime. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[36]  T. Meling,et al.  On the variability of cross-sectional dimensions and torsional properties of rectangular nickel-titanium arch wires. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[37]  W. Proffit,et al.  Effect of ion implantation of TMA archwires on the rate of orthodontic sliding space closure. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[38]  F. Mcdonald,et al.  A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets. , 2004, European journal of orthodontics.

[39]  T. Meling,et al.  The effects of loops on the torsional stiffnesses of rectangular wires: an in vitro study. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[40]  W. Brantley,et al.  Variability of effective root torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[41]  A. J. Goldberg,et al.  The Influence of Drawing Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Two Beta-titanium Alloys , 1983, Journal of dental research.