Driving Performance During Cell Phone Conversations and Common In-Vehicle Tasks While Sober and Drunk

The crash risk associated with cell phone use while driving is a contentious issue. Many states are introducing Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS) that may be accessed with cell phones while driving (e.g. 511 Traveler Information Services). In these contexts, there is a need for relevant research to determine the risk of cell phone use. This study compared driver performance while conversing on a hands-free cell phone to conditions of operating common in-vehicle controls (e.g., radio, fan, air conditioning) and alcohol intoxication (BAC 0.08). In addition, the study examined the combined effects of being distracted and being intoxicated given that there may be a higher risk of a crash if the driver engages in a combination of risk factors. During simulated traffic scenarios, resource allocation was assessed through behavioral measures and an event-related potential (ERP) novelty oddball paradigm. The results indicated that during a car following scenario, drivers engaged in the conversations or completing in-vehicle tasks were more impaired than drivers that were not involved in any distraction task. Indeed, both the cell phone and in-vehicle sources of distraction were generally more impairing than intoxication at the legal limit. These results will be used in a follow up study in order to compare the effects on attention of driving and using 511 to distraction from these tested distractions.

[1]  Andy Shea,et al.  Traffic Safety and the Driver , 1992 .

[2]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes , 2001 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Event Related Cortical Potential as an Index of Task Workload , 1977 .

[4]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[5]  A Michalski,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES IN ROAD SAFETY STUDIES , 2004 .

[6]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  SYNTHESIS REPORT: EXAMINATION OF TARGET VEHICULAR CRASHES AND POTENTIAL ITS COUNTERMEASURES. FINAL REPORT , 1995 .

[7]  Jonathan F. Antin,et al.  Instantaneous Measures of Mental Workload: An Initial Investigation , 1984 .

[8]  L. Mulder Measurement and analysis methods of heart rate and respiration for use in applied environments , 1992, Biological Psychology.

[9]  W. W. Wierwille Instantaneous mental workload - Concept and potential methods for measurement , 1981 .

[10]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Quantifying Car following Performance as a Metric for Primary and Secondary (Distraction) Task Load: Part A — Modification of Task Parameters , 2003 .

[11]  P. Lang Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications , 1980 .

[12]  L. Mulder,et al.  Information processing and cardiovascular control. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[13]  H J Eysenck,et al.  Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  C D Wickens,et al.  Mental workload and cognitive task automaticity: an evaluation of subjective and time estimation metrics. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[15]  Jeff Allen Greenberg,et al.  Driver Distraction: Evaluation with Event Detection Paradigm , 2003 .

[16]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Joseph T. Coyne,et al.  MENTAL WORKLOAD AS A FUNCTION OF TRAFFIC DENSITY: COMPARISON OF PHYSIOLOGICAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND SUBJECTIVE INDICES , 2005 .

[18]  W H Janssen,et al.  TASK LOAD AND STRESS ON THE ROAD: PRELIMINARIES TO A MODEL OF ROUTE CHOICE , 1984 .

[19]  Erwin Roeland Boer Behavioral Entropy as an Index of Workload , 2000 .

[20]  Giulio Ponte,et al.  Volume 1 - Findings , 1997 .

[21]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Sinus Arrhythmia: A Measure of Mental Effort , 1987, Human factors.

[23]  Ginger S. Watson,et al.  Hand-Held or Hands-Free? The Effects of Wireless Phone Interface Type on Phone Task Performance and Driver Preference , 2004 .

[24]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[25]  N. Squires,et al.  The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.

[26]  Jacqueline M. Jenkins,et al.  EXTENT AND EFFECTS OF HANDHELD CELLULAR TELEPHONE USE WHILE DRIVING , 2001 .

[27]  R W Backs,et al.  Metabolic and cardiorespiratory measures of mental effort: the effects of level of difficulty in a working memory task. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[28]  P A Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  A. M. van Roon,et al.  Short-term cardiovascular effects of mental task load , 1998 .

[30]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Driving experience and time-sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width , 1998 .

[31]  Erwin R. Boer,et al.  Development of a steering entropy method for evaluating driver workload , 1999 .

[32]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Factors influencing the use of cellular (mobile) phone during driving and hazards while using it. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  E. Sirevaag,et al.  A Psychophysiological Assessment of Operator Workload During Simulated Flight Missions , 1987, Human factors.

[34]  Stephen Legg,et al.  The effect of cell phone type on drivers subjective workload during concurrent driving and conversing. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  H. Debaere,et al.  Alcohol and drugs , 1976 .

[36]  A. Kramer,et al.  Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress , 1990, Multiple-task performance.

[37]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  THE DRIVING QUESTION , 1999 .

[38]  D. Damos Multiple-task performance , 2020 .

[39]  S J Westerman,et al.  Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: a critical review of research methodology , 2001, Ergonomics.

[40]  Christopher J Patrick,et al.  Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. , 2002, Psychological assessment.

[41]  王德伦 英语-翻译-Internet , 2000 .

[42]  Andrew Parkes,et al.  HOW DANGEROUS IS DRIVING WITH A MOBILE PHONE? BENCHMARKING THE IMPAIRMENT TO ALCOHOL , 2002 .

[43]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[44]  Meredith Rea Fogle Effects of In-Vehicle Information Systems on Driving Performance, Navigation, and Situation Awareness , 2004 .

[45]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[46]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[47]  S J Minogue,et al.  ALCOHOL AND DRUGS , 1973, The Medical journal of Australia.

[48]  Arie Matthijs van Roon,et al.  Short-term cardiovascular effects of mental tasks: physiology, experiments and computer simulations , 1998 .

[49]  Frank A. Drews,et al.  FATAL DISTRACTION? A COMPARISON OF THE CELL-PHONE DRIVER AND THE DRUNK DRIVER , 2005 .

[50]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Fearfulness and Affective Evaluations of Pictures , 1999 .

[51]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[52]  Johnell Brooks,et al.  Effects of remote and in-person verbal interactions on verbalization rates and attention to dynamic spatial scenes. , 2004, Accident Analysis and Prevention.

[53]  Jeff K. Caird,et al.  Age Differences in Visual Search for Traffic Signs During a Simulated Conversation , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[54]  W. Verwey,et al.  Detecting short periods of elevated workload: A comparison of nine workload assessment techniques , 1996 .

[55]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[56]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Event-Related Brain Potential as a Selective Index of Display Load , 1979 .

[57]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Measurement of driver mental workload , 1996 .

[58]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  MEASURING DRIVING PERFORMANCE BY CAR-FOLLOWING IN TRAFFIC , 1994 .

[59]  C D Wickens,et al.  Assessment of pilot performance and mental workload in rotary wing aircraft. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[60]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[61]  Jeff K. Caird,et al.  Effects of Passenger and Cellular Phone Conversations on Driver Distraction , 2004 .

[62]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  Mental Workload , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[63]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[64]  D. Mayfield,et al.  The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. , 1974, The American journal of psychiatry.

[65]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  How much visual road information is needed to drive safely and comfortably , 2004 .

[66]  James E. Prieger,et al.  The Impact of Driver Cell Phone Use on Accidents , 2004 .

[67]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  Using Cellular Telephones in Vehicles: Safe or Unsafe? , 1999 .

[68]  A T McCartt,et al.  Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[69]  David Rowell,et al.  Dangerous driving. , 2004, Australian nursing journal.

[70]  H Moskowitz ALCOHOL AND DRUGS. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN TRAFFIC SAFETY , 2002 .

[71]  F. Thomas Eggemeier,et al.  Workload assessment methodology. , 1986 .

[72]  J. Havard Alcohol and the driver. , 1978, British medical journal.

[73]  Monica M. Glumm,et al.  Cognitive Workload while Driving and Talking on a Cellular Phone or to a Passenger , 2000 .