Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides.

The present experimental study was designed to address two issues. The first was to investigate whether oxide properties of titanium implants influenced bone tissue responses after an in vivo implantation time of six weeks. If such a result was found, the second aim was to investigate which oxide properties are involved in such bone tissue responses. Screw-shaped implants with a wide range of oxide properties were prepared by electrochemical oxidation methods, where the oxide thickness varied in the range of 200 nm to 1000 nm. The surface morphology was prepared in two substantially different ways, i.e. barrier and porous oxide film structures. The micropore structure revealed pore sizes of 8 microm in diameter, with a range in opening area from 1.27 microm 2 to 2.1 microm 2. Porosity ranged from 12.7% to 24.4%. The crystal structures of the titanium oxide were amorphous, anatase and a mixture of anatase and rutile type. The chemical compositions consisted mainly of TiO2. Surface roughness ranged from 0.96 microm to 1.03 microm (Sa). Each group of test samples showed its own, defined status with respect to these various parameters. The oxide properties of turned commercially pure titanium implants were used in the control group, which was characterized by an oxide thickness of 17.4 +/- 6.2 nm, amorphous type in crystallinity, TiO2 in chemical composition, and a surface roughness of 0.83 microm (Sa). Bone tissue responses were evaluated by resonance frequency measurements and removal torque tests that were undertaken six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibia. Implants that had an oxide thickness of approximately 600, 800 and 1000 nm demonstrated significantly stronger bone responses in the evaluation of removal torque values than did implants that had an oxide thickness of approximately 17 and 200 nm (P < 0.05). However, there were no difference between implants with oxide thicknesses of 17 and 200 nm (P = 0.99). It was concluded that oxide properties of titanium implants, which include oxide thickness, micropore configurations and crystal structures, greatly influence the bone tissue response in the evaluation of removal torque values. However, it is not fully understood whether these oxide properties influence the bone tissue response separately or synergistically.

[1]  L. Rasmusson On implant integration in membrane-induced and grafted bone , 1998 .

[2]  T. Young,et al.  Ultrastructural analyses of the attachment (bonding) zone between bone and implanted biomaterials. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  T Albrektsson,et al.  A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface modified titanium implants – studies on the tissue response after 1 year to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[5]  L Sennerby,et al.  Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[6]  L Sennerby,et al.  Effects of barrier membranes on bone resorption and implant stability in onlay bone grafts. An experimental study. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  C. Ivanoff On surgical and implant related factors influencing integration and function of titanium implants. Experimental and clinical aspects , 1999 .

[8]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[9]  P. Morberg On bone tissue reactions to acrylic cement , 1991 .

[10]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  P. Thomsen,et al.  Ultrastructure of the bone-titanium interface in rabbits , 1992 .

[13]  U. Oron,et al.  Bone growth to metal implants is regulated by their surface chemical properties. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[14]  E. Hunziker,et al.  Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[16]  H. Hansson,et al.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. , 1981, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  L Sennerby,et al.  Stability measurements of one-stage Brånemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. , 1999, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[18]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  T Albrektsson,et al.  The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[21]  L. Rasmusson,et al.  Morphological and dimensional changes after barrier removal in bone formed beyond the skeletal borders at titanium implants. A kinetic study in the rabbit tibia. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  Carina B. Johansson,et al.  On tissue reactions to metal implants , 1991 .

[23]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[24]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. , 1988, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[25]  Ingemar Lundström,et al.  Auger electron spectroscopic studies of the interface between human tissue and implants of titanium and stainless steel , 1986 .

[26]  L Sennerby,et al.  The influence of simultaneous versus delayed placement on the stability of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts. A histologic and biomechanic study in the rabbit. , 1999, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[27]  M. E. McAlarney,et al.  Effects of titanium dioxide passive film crystal structure, thickness, and crystallinity on C3 adsorption. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  Lars Sennerby,et al.  The influence of simultaneous versus delayed placement on the stability of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts , 1999 .

[29]  L Sennerby,et al.  The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[31]  L Sennerby,et al.  Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis in the grafted maxilla: a cross-sectional pilot study. , 1999, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[32]  J Li,et al.  Behaviour of titanium and titania-based ceramics in vitro and in vivo. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[33]  L Sennerby,et al.  Stability assessments and histology of titanium implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone in the rabbit tibia. , 1998, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[34]  L. Sennerby On the bone tissue response to titanium implants , 1991 .

[35]  A. Wennerberg On surface roughness and implant incorporation , 1996 .