Appropriation in the development of information systems for voluntary organisations

This paper describes two action research projects in co-located voluntary organizations, where both projects could be characterized as process failures. Our main focus is on the mechanisms of appropriation. The analytic framework as well as the basis for the action research projects, have been informed by activity theory. In particular we describe how ICT-based systems enforce structural discipline, how designers may misconceive the design task when designing for voluntary organisations, how the tension between use value and exchange value influences the use and thus appropriation of ICT in voluntary organisations, and finally what the possible impact of a lacking common conceptual basis may be. It is concluded that voluntary organisations exhibit unique features that should be taken into account in the design of ICT based support.

[1]  Olav W. Bertelsen.  The Festival Checklist: Design as the Transformation of Artefacts , 1996 .

[2]  Jean Baudrillard,et al.  3 For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign , 1980, Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings.

[3]  K. Marx.  Das Kapital : Kritik der politischen Ökonomie , 1922 .

[4]  Darren Dalcher,et al.  Learning from information systems failures by using narrative and ante-narrative methods , 2003, South Afr. Comput. J..

[5]  Karl Marx,et al.  Das Kapital : Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, erster Band, Hamburg 1890 , 1983 .

[6]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget , 1996 .

[7]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[8]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[9]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[10]  Doug Schuler,et al.  A Pattern Language for Living Communication , 2002 .

[11]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[12]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[13]  Olav W. Bertelsen,et al.  Contradictions in the Festival Project Activity systems , obstacles , and dynamic forces in design , 1996 .

[14]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Computers — Utensils or epaulets? The application perspective revisited , 1988, AI & SOCIETY.

[15]  Volkmar Pipek,et al.  From tailoring to appropriation support: Negotiating groupware usage , 2005 .

[16]  Pär-Ola Zander.  The Role of Collective Subjects in Appropriation - An Evaluation of a Collaborative Writing Project , 2005, CELDA.