Latitudinal effect in semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity

[1] The study of the semiannual variation in both geomagnetic activity indices and raw geomagnetic field data at a large number of geomagnetic observatories showed a dramatic decrease in the relative magnitude of this variation from low to high latitudes. While the semiannual variation in the Dst index at low latitudes is about 3 times, for the midlatitude Ap and Am indices it is only about 20–30%, and the auroral electrojet AE index and polar cap PCN index show a very small or no semiannual variation. The study of auroral electrojet AU and AL indices showed that the semiannual variation is evident in AL index and not observed in AU index. Although relative magnitudes of the semiannual variation in geomagnetic activity indices are strongly reduced at high latitudes, absolute magnitudes of these variations in the Dst, Ap, Am, and AL indices are approximately the same. The semiannual variation in geomagnetic field H component consists of two equinoctial minima probably caused by the increasing westward ring current and substorm westward auroral electrojet in equinoctial months. The additional analysis of raw geomagnetic field data from geomagnetic observatories in two hemispheres confirmed the results inferred from the study of geomagnetic indices. Meanwhile in the polar caps, the semiannual variation in raw geomagnetic data showing a strong decrease in geomagnetic field H component reveals a strong increase in the Z component which also might be caused by increasing the ring current and westward auroral electrojet during enhanced geomagnetic activity occurring in equinoctial months. It was also found that the amplitude of the semiannual variation at all latitudes increased significantly with increasing geomagnetic activity.

[1]  C. Meng,et al.  Ultraviolet insolation drives seasonal and diurnal space weather variations , 2002 .

[2]  G. Sofko,et al.  Substorm onset times as derived from geomagnetic indices , 2002 .

[3]  P. Newell,et al.  Solar illumination as cause of the equinoctial preference for geomagnetic activity , 2001 .

[4]  E. Kihn,et al.  Seasonal and solar cycle variations of the auroral electrojet indices , 2000 .

[5]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Mountains versus valleys: Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity , 2000 .

[6]  L. A. Hajkowicz Longitudinal (UT) effect in the onset of auroral disturbances over two solar cycles as deduced from the AE-index , 1998 .

[7]  Manuel Grande,et al.  Current understanding of magnetic storms: storm-substorm relationships , 1998 .

[8]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Two‐component auroral electrojet: Importance for substorm studies , 1996 .

[9]  G. Rostoker Phenomenology and physics of magnetospheric substorms , 1996 .

[10]  M. Storini,et al.  Semiannual variation of the geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters , 1993 .

[11]  A. Berthelier Influence of the polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field on the annual and diurnal variations of the magnetic activity , 1975 .

[12]  D. Mcintosh,et al.  On the annual variation of magnetic disturbance , 1959, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  A. Cortie Sun-spots and terrestrial magnetic phenomena, 1898-1911 , 1912 .

[14]  Y. Kamide,et al.  The semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity: phases and profiles for 130 years of aa data , 2002 .

[15]  P. Mayaud,et al.  Derivation, Meaning, and Use of Geomagnetic Indices , 1980 .

[16]  Robert L. McPherron,et al.  Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity , 1973 .