Explicit consideration of uncertainty in Great Lakes fisheries management : decision analysis of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) control in the St. Marys River

We used decision analysis to assist the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) with sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) control in the St. Marys River, which connects Lake Superior to Lake Huron and until recently has been a major source of sea lamprey infestation of Lake Huron. The process involved decision-makers, managers, and experts in an analysis of management options, objectives, and critical uncertainties affecting the expected perfor- mance of alternative choices. We developed quantitative assessments of uncertainty about sea lamprey demographics and about the implementation effectiveness of three pest control options: trapping adult lampreys, sterile male releases, and lampricide treatment. We used a stochastic simulation model to forecast future parasitic sea lamprey abundance in Lake Huron for 10 management options. Management options that included enhanced levels of trapping and sterile male releases exhibited the best performance for all measures. Our analysis substantially influenced the GLFC strategy for the St. Marys River, providing an example of how explicit consideration of uncertainty using decision analysis can influence fishery management decisions. Resume : Nous utilisons l'analyse decisionnelle pour aider la Commission des pecheries des Grands Lacs (GLFC) a controler la grande lamproie marine (Petromyzon marinus) dans la riviere St. Marys qui relie le lac Superieur au lac Huron et qui, jusqu'a recemment, etait une source majeure d'infestation des grandes lamproies marines au lac Huron. Le processus reunit les decideurs, les gestionnaires et les experts pour une analyse des options de gestion, des objectifs et des incertitudes critiques qui affectent la performance attendue des divers choix. Nous avons mis au point des eva- luations quantitatives de l'incertitude relative a la demographie de la grande lamproie marine, ainsi qu'a l'efficacite de la mise en oeuvre de trois choix de lutte contre ces ravageurs, soit le trappage des lamproies adultes, la liberation de mâles steriles et le traitement au lampricide. Nous utilisons un modele de simulation stochastique pour predire l'abondance future des grandes lamproies marines parasites au lac Huron en fonction de 10 options de gestion. De toutes les options de gestion, celles qui incluent une augmentation du trappage des adultes et de la liberation des mâles steriles connaissent les meilleures performances. Notre analyse a influence de facon importante la strategie de la GLFC dans la riviere St. Marys; c'est la un exemple qui montre comment la prise en consideration explicite de l'incertitude a l'aide d'une analyse decisionnelle peut influencer les choix de gestion des peches.

[1]  B. R. Smith,et al.  Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in Lakes Huron, Michigan, and Superior: History of Invasion and Control, 1936–78 , 1980 .

[2]  David A. Johnson,et al.  A Case History of Sea Lamprey Control in Lake Michigan: 1979 to 1999 , 2003 .

[3]  S. Kuikka,et al.  Modeling environmentally driven uncertainties in Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) management by Bayesian influence diagrams , 1999 .

[4]  D. Pimentel Aquatic Nuisance Species in the New York State Canal and Hudson River Systems and the Great Lakes Basin: An Economic and Environmental Assessment , 2005, Environmental management.

[5]  Planning and Executing a Lampricide Treatment of the St. Marys River Using Georeferenced Data , 2003 .

[6]  S. Frederick,et al.  Choosing fisheries harvest policies : when does uncertainty matter? , 1995 .

[7]  Michal L. Jones,et al.  Compensatory Mechanisms in Great Lakes Sea Lamprey Populations: Implications for Alternative Control Strategies , 2003 .

[8]  J. Koonce,et al.  An Economic Injury Level Approach to Establishing the Intensity of Sea Lamprey Control in the Great Lakes , 1993 .

[9]  R. Keeney Decision analysis: an overview. , 1982, Operations research.

[10]  J. Bence,et al.  Recommendations for Assessing Sea Lamprey Damages: Toward Optimizing the Control Program in the Great Lakes , 2003 .

[11]  M K McAllister,et al.  Using Bayesian decision analysis to help achieve a precautionary approach for managing developing fisheries , 1998 .

[12]  R. Young,et al.  Reduction in Sea Lamprey Hatching Success Due to Release of Sterilized Males , 2003 .

[13]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. 1968. , 1969, M.D.Computing.

[14]  C. Walters,et al.  Measurement Errors and Uncertainty in Parameter Estimates for Stock and Recruitment , 1981 .

[15]  R. Young,et al.  Development and Implementation of an Integrated Program for Control of Sea Lampreys in the St. Marys River , 2003 .

[16]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Management under Uncertainty , 1984 .

[17]  Calvin N. Peters,et al.  Application of decision analysis to evaluate recovery actions for threatened Snake River fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) , 2001 .

[18]  Andrew A. Rosenberg,et al.  Uncertainty and Risk Evaluation in Stock Assessment Advice for U.S. Marine Fisheries , 1994 .

[19]  M. Tanner Tools for statistical inference: methods for the exploration of posterior distributions and likeliho , 1994 .

[20]  Shane Frederick,et al.  Bayesian decision analysis and uncertainty in fisheries management , 1998 .

[21]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach , 1997, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[22]  A. Ricciardi Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an "invasional meltdown" occurring in the Great Lakes? , 2001 .

[23]  Chris Goddard,et al.  Sea Lamprey International Symposium (SLIS II): Advances in the Integrated Management of Sea Lamprey in the Great Lakes , 2003 .

[24]  André E. Punt,et al.  Evaluation of management tools for Australia's South East Fishery.2. How well can management quantities be estimated? , 2002 .

[25]  Judith L. Anderson,et al.  Decision Analysis: A Method for Taking Uncertainties into Account in Risk-Based Decision Making , 1999 .

[26]  André E. Punt,et al.  Evaluation of management tools for Australia's South East Fishery.3. Towards selecting appropriate harvest strategies , 2002 .

[27]  Robert L. Stephenson,et al.  A framework for risk analysis in fisheries decision-making , 1998 .

[28]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[29]  David R. Marmorek,et al.  Application of decision analysis to evaluate recovery actions for threatened Snake River spring and summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) , 2001 .

[30]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[31]  J. Seelye,et al.  The Sterile-Male-Release Technique in Great Lakes Sea Lamprey Management , 2003 .

[32]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Current Trends in Including Risk and Uncertainty in Stock Assessment and Harvest Decisions , 1993 .

[33]  Michal L. Jones,et al.  Assessing Assessment: Can the Expected Effects of the St. Marys River Sea Lamprey Control Strategy Be Detected? , 2003 .

[34]  Michal L. Jones,et al.  Estimating Uncertainty in the Stock-Recruitment Relationship for St. Marys River Sea Lampreys , 2003 .

[35]  David A. Fournier,et al.  A General Theory for Analyzing Catch at Age Data , 1982 .