AHP, CRITIC VE WEDBA YÖNTEMLERİNİ İÇEREN ENTEGRE BİR ÇKKV MODELİ İLE AXA SİGORTA ŞİRKETİNİN FİNANSAL PERFORMANSININ ANALİZİ

The systematic evaluation of the performance of insurance companies operating in a dynamic and competitive environment in order to increase their competitiveness in the market contributes to the development and growth of financial markets, enabling the formation of a strong financial system and the establishment of economic stability. In this study, it is aimed to assess the financial performance of Axa insurance company, one of the pioneering and leading companies of the Turkish insurance industry, for the period of 2011-2020 with a new hybrid MCDM model. In the study, firstly, two weighting methods (subjective (AHP) and objective (CRITIC)) were integrated in determining the weighting coefficients of financial criteria in order to balance the two weighting methods. In addition, the WEDBA methodology, which is rarely used in the literature to solve any MCDM problem, was used in this study and thus a new integrated MCDM model was introduced to the literature. Based on the findings obtained from the AHP-CRITIC-WEDBA model, the most successful (unsuccessful) year of Axa insurance was determined as 2016 (2012). As a result, it can be stated that there are significant instabilities in the financial performance of Axa Sigorta for the 10-year period covering the 2011-2020 period

[1]  S.Tezcan Camlibel.  Comparison of Management and Financial Performance in the Turkish Insurance Sector: An Example of Clustering Analysis , 2021, Sivas Soft Bilisim Proje Danismanlik Egitim Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi.

[2]  Sunitha Kumaran.  Financial Performance Index of IPO firms using VIKOR-CRITIC techniques , 2021, Finance Research Letters.

[3]  Engin Karakış.  Machine Selection for a Textile Company with CRITIC and MAUT Methods , 2021, European Journal of Science and Technology.

[4]  Nergis Özispa,et al.  Limanların Sürdürülebilirlik Stratejilerinin AHP Yaklaşımı ile Önceliklendirilmesi , 2021 .

[5]  Shattri Mansor,et al.  Land-Use Suitability Assessment Using Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process (D-AHP) Hybrid Model for Coastal City Management: Kuala Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia , 2021, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[6]  Özcan Işik.  Analysing The Determinants of Profitability of Domestic And Foreign Non-Life Insurers in Turkey , 2021 .

[7]  Zareen Alamgir,et al.  An effective blockchain evaluation system based on entropy-CRITIC weight method and MCDM techniques , 2021, Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications.

[8]  Yasir Ahmed Solangi,et al.  Assessing and overcoming the renewable energy barriers for sustainable development in Pakistan: An integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach , 2021 .

[9]  D. Pamučar,et al.  MARCOS technique under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for determining the COVID-19 pandemic performance of insurance companies in terms of healthcare services , 2021, Applied Soft Computing.

[10]  Lokesh Vijayvargy,et al.  Assessment of stress level in urban area’s during COVID-19 outbreak using critic and topsis: A case of Indian cities , 2021 .

[11]  J. Chatterjee,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for purchasing life insurance in India , 2021 .

[12]  A. Ulutaş.  Stacker Selection with PSI and WEDBA Methods , 2020 .

[13]  Nabankur Mandal,et al.  Performance evaluation of an insurance company using an integrated Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Best-Worst Method (BWM) , 2020, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[14]  Ching-Fang Liaw,et al.  A Hybrid MCDM Model to Evaluate and Classify Outsourcing Providers in Manufacturing , 2020, Symmetry.

[15]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  A novel approach integrating AHP and TOPSIS under spherical fuzzy sets for advanced manufacturing system selection , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[16]  Tausif Ali,et al.  Prioritizing the existing power generation technologies in Bangladesh’s clean energy scheme using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model , 2020 .

[17]  Ahmet Çalık,et al.  A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era , 2020, Soft Computing.

[18]  Osman Yavuz Akbulut.  FİNANSAL PERFORMANS İLE PAY SENEDİ GETİRİSİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN BÜTÜNLEŞİK CRITIC VE MABAC ÇKKV TEKNİKLERİYLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BORSA İSTANBUL ÇİMENTO SEKTÖRÜ FİRMALARI ÜZERİNE AMPİRİK BİR UYGULAMA , 2020 .

[19]  M. Mohsin,et al.  Assessing the integration of solar power projects: SWOT-based AHP–F-TOPSIS case study of Turkey , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[20]  H. Lyu,et al.  Inundation risk assessment of metro system using AHP and TFN-AHP in Shenzhen , 2020 .

[21]  Salih Aka,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS , 2020, International Journal of Management Economics and Business.

[22]  Romualdas Bausys,et al.  An integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainability Performance Assessment for Insurance Companies , 2020, Sustainability.

[23]  Xindong Peng,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation , 2019, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[24]  Deepa,et al.  Realizing Sustainable Development via Modified Integrated Weighting MCDM Model for Ranking Agrarian Dataset , 2019, Sustainability.

[25]  Osman Yavuz Akbulut.  CRITIC ve EDAS Yöntemleri İle İş Bankası'nın 2009-2018 Yılları Arasındaki Performansının Analizi , 2019, Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi.

[26]  Ahmet Çalık,et al.  An integrated AHP‐TOPSIS framework for foreign direct investment in Turkey , 2019, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.

[27]  Minwir Al-Shammari,et al.  A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model for customers’ bank selection decision in the Kingdom of Bahrain , 2019, Oper. Res..

[28]  Özcan Işik.  TÜRKİYE'DE HAYAT DIŞI SİGORTA SEKTÖRÜNÜN FİNANSAL PERFORMANSININ CRITIC TABANLI TOPSIS VE MULTIMOORA YÖNTEMİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ , 2019, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal.

[29]  Alptekin Ulutaş,et al.  CRITIC ve ROV Yöntemleri İle Bir Kargo Firmasının 2011-2017 Yılları Sırasındaki Performansının Analiz Edilmesi , 2019, MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi.

[30]  Ahmet Çalık,et al.  Otomotiv Tedarik Zincirinde Risk Değerlendirmesi için Bulanık AHP ve TOPSIS ile Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım - An Integrated Approach with Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS for Risk Assessment in Automotive Supply Chain , 2018, Journal of Business Research - Turk.

[31]  Rangan Gupta,et al.  Insurance activity and economic performance: Fresh evidence from asymmetric panel causality tests , 2018, International Finance.

[32]  Mohammad Kazem Sayadi,et al.  A New Approach to Investigate the Performance of Insurance Branches in Iran Using Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Inference System , 2018 .

[33]  Aakash Gupta,et al.  Implementing weighted entropy-distance based approach for the selection of software reliability growth models , 2018, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[34]  Rakesh Garg,et al.  Optimal selection of E-learning websites using multiattribute decision-making approaches , 2017 .

[35]  Ahmet Çalık,et al.  Aralık Tip-2 Bulanık AHP Yöntemi ile Üçüncü Parti Tersine Lojistik (3PTL) Firma Seçimi , 2017 .

[36]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Assessment of third-party logistics providers using a CRITIC–WASPAS approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2017 .

[37]  Mandić Ksenija,et al.  Analysis of the efficiency of insurance companies in Serbia using the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods , 2017 .

[38]  Metin Dağdeviren,et al.  A Life Insurance Policy Selection via Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Decision Making Model , 2016 .

[39]  R. Madlener,et al.  AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia , 2016 .

[40]  A. T. Isik,et al.  QUALIFLEX and ORESTE Methods for the Insurance Company Selection Problem , 2016 .

[41]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  AHP-VIKOR ENTEGRE YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ: TEKSTİL SEKTÖRÜ UYGULAMASI , 2016 .

[42]  Daniel Podgórski,et al.  Measuring operational performance of OSH management system ??? A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators , 2015 .

[43]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  A hybrid banking websites quality evaluation model using AHP and COPRAS-G: a Turkey case , 2014 .

[44]  A. Culyer,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process , 2013 .

[45]  Tamer Eren,et al.  Üçüncü Parti Lojistik (3PL) Firmanın Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreciyle (AHS) Belirlenmesi , 2012 .

[46]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using Euclidean distance-based integrated approach , 2011 .

[47]  Z. H. Che,et al.  A fuzzy AHP and DEA approach for making bank loan decisions for small and medium enterprises in Taiwan , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  Metin Dağdeviren,et al.  Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[49]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[50]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  Finding the most preferred alliance structure between banks and insurance companies , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[52]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[53]  T. Saaty.  Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[54]  J. Lafuente,et al.  Evaluation and ranking of insurance companies by combining TOPSIS and the interval fuzzy rough sets , 2021, Serbian Journal of Management.

[55]  Vineet Jain,et al.  Application of MADM methods as MOORA and WEDBA for ranking of FMS flexibility , 2019, International Journal of Data and Network Science.

[56]  Omar Bataineh,et al.  Extending the WEDBA to the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making environment , 2019, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[57]  Basar Öztaysi,et al.  A decision model for information technology selection using AHP integrated TOPSIS-Grey: The case of content management systems , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..