Pathophysiological interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings in clinical practice

[1]  D. Wertheim,et al.  Physiological CTG categorization in types of hypoxia compared with MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with HIE , 2022, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[2]  A. Dall'asta,et al.  Short‐term morbidity and types of intrapartum hypoxia in the newborn with metabolic acidaemia: a retrospective cohort study , 2022, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  L. Esteban,et al.  Diagnostic capacity and interobserver variability in FIGO, ACOG, NICE and Chandraharan cardiotocographic guidelines to predict neonatal acidemia , 2021, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[4]  D. Wertheim,et al.  Absence of fetal heart rate cycling on the intrapartum cardiotocograph (CTG) is associated with intrapartum pyrexia and lower Apgar scores , 2021, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[5]  A. Vintzileos,et al.  Timing intrapartum management based on the evolution and duration of fetal heart rate patterns , 2021, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[6]  E. Chandraharan.  Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcomes , 2021, Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine.

[7]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Erroneous Recording of Maternal Heart Rate as Fetal Heart Rate During Second Stage of Labour: Isn’t it Time to Stop this? , 2021, Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences.

[8]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Cardiotocograph (CTG) changes and maternal and neonatal outcomes in chorioamnionitis and/or funisitis confirmed on histopathology. , 2021, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[9]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  FETAL HEART RATE PATTERN IN TERM OR NEAR-TERM CEREBRAL PALSY: LOOKING AT THE DATA IN THE RIGHT PERSPECTIVE. , 2021, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Fetal heart rate monitoring in labor: from pattern recognition to fetal physiology , 2021 .

[11]  R. Romero,et al.  Clinical chorioamnionitis at term X: microbiology, clinical signs, placental pathology, and neonatal bacteremia – implications for clinical care , 2021, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[12]  J. Westgate,et al.  Deceleration area and capacity during labour‐like umbilical cord occlusions identify evolving hypotension: a controlled study in fetal sheep , 2020, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  S. Tardieu,et al.  Fetal physiology cardiotocography training, a regional evaluation. , 2020, Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction.

[14]  A. Dall'asta,et al.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate between 150 and 160 bpm at or after 40 weeks and labor outcome , 2020, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[15]  S. Andersson,et al.  Intrapartum zigzag pattern of fetal heart rate is an early sign of fetal hypoxia: A large obstetric retrospective cohort study , 2020, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[16]  B. Schifrin.  Electronic Fetal Monitoring–Prevention or Rescue? , 2020, Frontiers in Pediatrics.

[17]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Fetal heart rate changes on the cardiotocograph trace secondary to maternal COVID-19 infection , 2020, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

[18]  E. Chandraharan.  True vs Spurious Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Accelerations on the Cardiotocograph (CTG): An Urgent Need for Caution , 2020, Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine.

[19]  T. Ikeda,et al.  Evaluation of 3-tier and 5-tier FHR pattern classifications using umbilical blood pH and base excess at delivery , 2020, PloS one.

[20]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Types of intrapartum hypoxia on the cardiotocograph (CTG): do they have any relationship with the type of brain injury in the MRI scan in term babies? , 2020, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[21]  D. Cuadras,et al.  Does the saltatory pattern on cardiotocograph (CTG) trace really exist? The ZigZag pattern as an alternative definition and its correlation with perinatal outcomes , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[22]  A. Dall'asta,et al.  Intrapartum cardiotocography patterns observed in suspected clinical and subclinical chorioamnionitis in term fetuses , 2019, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[23]  E. Chandraharan.  Intrapartum care: An urgent need to question historical practices and ‘non-evidence’-based, illogical foetal monitoring guidelines to avoid patient harm , 2019, Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management.

[24]  G. Macones,et al.  Marked variability in intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate patterns: Association with neonatal morbidity and abnormal arterial cord gas , 2019, Journal of Perinatology.

[25]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Physiological CTG interpretation: the significance of baseline fetal heart rate changes after the onset of decelerations and associated perinatal outcomes , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[26]  H. L. Price,et al.  Evaluating the value of intrapartum fetal scalp blood sampling to predict adverse neonatal outcomes: A UK multicentre observational study. , 2019, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[27]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  The Significance of ‘Non-Significant’ Meconium Stained Amniotic Fluid (MSAF): Colour versus Contents , 2019, Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research.

[28]  G. Macones,et al.  Acidemia Can Occur Despite Category I Tracing , 2019, American Journal of Perinatology.

[29]  R. Romero,et al.  Clinical chorioamnionitis at term IX: in vivo evidence of intra-amniotic inflammasome activation , 2019, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[30]  J. Westgate,et al.  The peripheral chemoreflex: indefatigable guardian of fetal physiological adaptation to labour , 2018, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Alison G. Cahill,et al.  A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  E. Chandraharan.  Foetal electrocardiograph (ST-analyser or STAN) for intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: a friend or a foe? , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[33]  M. Preti,et al.  Importance of fetal heart rate cycling during the interpretation of the cardiotocograph (CTG) , 2018 .

[34]  Liz Schroeder,et al.  The INFANT trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[35]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Recognition of chronic hypoxia and pre‐existing foetal injury on the cardiotocograph (CTG): Urgent need to think beyond the guidelines , 2017, Porto biomedical journal.

[36]  B. Mol,et al.  Does ST analysis have a place in electronic fetal monitoring? , 2017, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[37]  J. De Jonckheere,et al.  Understanding fetal physiology and second line monitoring during labor. , 2017, Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction.

[38]  Austin Ugwumadu,et al.  Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines , 2017, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[39]  Samuel Smith,et al.  The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Ensuring Competency in Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring: The Role of GIMS , 2017 .

[41]  E. Chandraharan.  Fetal scalp blood sampling should be abandoned: FOR: FBS does not fulfil the principle of first do no harm , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[42]  Aaron J Epstein,et al.  Web-based comparison of historical vs contemporary methods of fetal heart rate interpretation. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  João Bernardes,et al.  Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[44]  João Bernardes,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of computerized cardiotocographic parameters throughout pregnancy in normal fetuses: a prospective cohort study , 2016, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[45]  A. Vintzileos,et al.  Decelerations, tachycardia, and decreased variability: have we overlooked the significance of longitudinal fetal heart rate changes for detecting intrapartum fetal hypoxia? , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[46]  R. Romero,et al.  Meconium aspiration syndrome: a role for fetal systemic inflammation. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[47]  E. Chandraharan.  Should national guidelines continue to recommend fetal scalp blood sampling during labor? , 2016, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[48]  G. Macones,et al.  Nonreassuring Fetal Status in the Second Stage of Labor: Fetal Monitoring Features and Association with Neonatal Outcomes , 2016, American Journal of Perinatology.

[49]  E. Blix,et al.  ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized trials , 2016, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[50]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Fetal monitoring in labor: Implications of evidence generated by new systematic review , 2016, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[51]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Does knowledge of fetal outcome influence the interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocography and subsequent clinical management? A multicentre European study , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[52]  E. Chandraharan.  Each Fetus Matters: An Urgent Paradigm Shift is needed to Move away from the Rigid “CTG Guideline Stickers” so as to Individualize Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring and to improve Perinatal Outcomes , 2016 .

[53]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[54]  R. Romero,et al.  Clinical chorioamnionitis at term II: the intra-amniotic inflammatory response , 2016, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[55]  J. Gécz,et al.  Cerebral palsy: causes, pathways, and the role of genetic variants. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[56]  R. Romero,et al.  Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[57]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[58]  S. Cnattingius,et al.  Neonatal outcome and delivery mode in labors with repetitive fetal scalp blood sampling. , 2015, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[59]  E. Chandraharan.  Fetal scalp blood sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test that no longer has a place in modern clinical obstetrics? , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[60]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: an appraisal of the physiological basis and scientific evidence , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[61]  R. Romero,et al.  Bacteria and endotoxin in meconium-stained amniotic fluid at term: could intra-amniotic infection cause meconium passage? , 2014, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[62]  Niraj Yanamandra and Edwin Chandraharan.  Saltatory and Sinusoidal Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) Patterns and significance of FHR ‘Overshoots’ , 2014 .

[63]  David A. Miller,et al.  Intrapartum management of category II fetal heart rate tracings: towards standardization of care. , 2013, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[64]  Edwin Chandraharan,et al.  Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph , 2012, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[65]  G. Macones,et al.  Association of Atypical Decelerations With Acidemia , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[66]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Human factors affecting the interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings: an update , 2012, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[67]  Leah Antoniewicz,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[68]  J. Reinhard,et al.  Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Intrapartum Cardiotocography: A Multicenter Study Comparing the FIGO Classification with Computer Analysis Software , 2011, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[69]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians’ interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph , 2011, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[70]  T. Garite,et al.  Intrauterine resuscitation during labor. , 2011, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[71]  C. East,et al.  Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[72]  G. Macones,et al.  Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Nomenclature, Interpretation, and General Management Principles , 2009 .

[73]  A. Vintzileos.  Evidence-Based Compared With Reality-Based Medicine in Obstetrics. , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[74]  C. Spong.  Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: another look. , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[75]  C. Spong,et al.  The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. , 2008, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[76]  Edwin Chandraharan,et al.  Prevention of birth asphyxia: responding appropriately to cardiotocograph (CTG) traces. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[77]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[78]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Acute tocolysis , 2005, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[79]  Sandra Hernandez,et al.  Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome , 2005, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[80]  C. East,et al.  Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[81]  Y. Kimura,et al.  Contribution of the Fetal Baroreceptor Reflex to the Low Frequency Component of Fetal Heart Rate Fluctuations , 2003, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[82]  F. Maillard,et al.  Predictive value of pulse oximetry and fetal scalp blood pH in the case of meconium-stained amniotic fluid. , 2003, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[83]  G. Heinze,et al.  Influence on fetal blood pH when adding amniotic fluid: an in vitro model , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[84]  K. Williams,et al.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns in the prediction of neonatal acidemia. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[85]  E. Blix,et al.  Inter‐observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[86]  D. Sherman,et al.  Characteristics of Maternal Heart Rate Patterns During Labor and Delivery , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[87]  R. Liston,et al.  Fetal health surveillance in labour. , 2002, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[88]  O. Sheil,et al.  Fever in labour and neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective cohort study. , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[89]  D B Swedlow,et al.  A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[90]  J. Phelan,et al.  Fetal heart rate observations in the brain-damaged infant. , 2000, Seminars in perinatology.

[91]  J. Parer,et al.  Fetal heart rate patterns in postasphyxiated fetal lambs with brain damage. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[92]  J. Wright,et al.  Interpreting the fetal heart rate tracing. Effect of knowledge of neonatal outcome. , 1998, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[93]  K. Nelson,et al.  Maternal infection and cerebral palsy in infants of normal birth weight. , 1997, JAMA.

[94]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms , 1997, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[95]  J. Keogh,et al.  The intrapartum CTG prior to neonatal encephalopathy at term: a case‐control study , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[96]  J M Dambrosia,et al.  Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[97]  B. Schifrin,et al.  INTRAPARTUM ELECTRONIC FETAL HEART RATE MONITORING VERSUS INTERMITTENT AUSCULTATION: A META‐ANALYSIS , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[98]  A. Vintzileos,et al.  Heart Rate Cyclicity During Labor in Healthy Term Fetuses , 1989, American journal of perinatology.

[99]  J. Rodis,et al.  Relationship Between Cyclic Variation of Fetal Heart Rate Patterns and Cord pH in Preterm Gestations , 1989, American journal of perinatology.

[100]  G. Dawes,et al.  Carotid Baroreceptors in Fetal and Newborn Sheep , 1988, Pediatric Research.

[101]  A. Lalonde,et al.  The reproducibility of intrapartum cardiotocogram assessments. , 1982, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[102]  B. Siassi,et al.  Baroreceptor and chemoreceptor responses to umbilical cord occlusion in fetal lambs. , 1979, Biology of the neonate.

[103]  E H Hon,et al.  Clinical fetal monitoring. VII. The evaluation and significance of intrapartum baseline FHR variability. , 1975, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[104]  G. M. Filshie,et al.  THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CHANGES IN THE CONTINUOUS FETAL HEART RATE IN THE FIRST STAGE OF LABOUR , 1971, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[105]  E. Hon.  The Classification of Fetal Heart Rate I. A Working Classification , 1963, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[106]  J. J. Poseiro,et al.  EFFECTS OF ABNORMAL UTERINE CONTRACTIONS ON A HUMAN FETUS. , 1963, Bibliotheca paediatrica.

[107]  E. Hon,et al.  ELECTRONIC EVALUATION OF THE FETAL HEART RATE. VIII. PATTERNS PRECEDING FETAL DEATH, FURTHER OBSERVATIONS. , 1963, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[108]  R. Caldeyro-barcia,et al.  Recording of intramuscular pressure in the human myometrium. , 1961, Journal of applied physiology.

[109]  R. Caldeyro-barcia,et al.  OXYTOCIN AND CONTRACTILITY OF THE PREGNANT HUMAN UTERUS * , 1959, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[110]  A. Dall'asta,et al.  STAN: a reappraisal of its clinical usefulness , 2022, Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology.