Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation.

Group-living animals are often faced with choosing between one or more alternative resource sites. A central question in such collective decision making includes determining which individuals induce the decision and when. This experimental and theoretical study of shelter selection by cockroach groups demonstrates that choices can emerge through nonlinear interaction dynamics between equal individuals without perfect knowledge or leadership. We identify a simple mechanism whereby a decision is taken on the move with limited information and signaling and without comparison of available opportunities. This mechanism leads to optimal mean benefit for group individuals. Our model points to a generic self-organized collective decision-making process independent of animal species.

[1]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[2]  J. Krause,et al.  Social organisation , 2022 .

[3]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[4]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions , 2004, Nature.

[5]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[7]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Cockroach aggregation based on strain odour recognition , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  S. Pratt,et al.  A modelling framework for understanding social insect foraging , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  J. Hutchinson.  Animal groups in three dimensions , 1999 .

[10]  George N. Reeke,et al.  BOOK REVIEW: "SELF-ORGANIZATION IN BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS" BY S. CAMAZINE, J. DENEUBOURG, N. R. FRANKS, J. SNEYD, G. THERAULAZ AND E. BONABEAU , 2002 .

[11]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Discrete dragline attachment induces aggregation in spiderlings of a solitary species , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  D. Sumpter.  The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  M. Dambach,et al.  Aggregation density and longevity correlate with humidity in first-instar nymphs of the cockroach (Blattella germanica L., Dictyoptera). , 1999, Journal of insect physiology.

[14]  John G. Robinson.  On the Move. How and Why Animals Travel in Groups , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  J. Fewell.  Social Insect Networks , 2003, Science.

[16]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Group decision-making in animals , 2003, Nature.

[17]  W. Hamilton.  Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Cell cycle: Complex evolution , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Joan B. Silk,et al.  On the Move. How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. , 2000 .

[20]  H. Reeve,et al.  Colony activity integration in primitively eusocial wasps: the role of the queen (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  A Basis for Spatial and Social Patterns in Ant Species: Dynamics and Mechanisms of Aggregation , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[22]  D. Penn.  The scent of genetic compatibility: Sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex , 2002 .

[23]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From nonlinearity to optimality: pheromone trail foraging by ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  FAD: Fish Aggregating Device or Fish Attracting Device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Complexity of Environment and Parsimony of Decision Rules in Insect Societies , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.