Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway

Objective To evaluate the application of clinical pathway simulation in machine learning, using clinical audit data, in order to identify key drivers for improving use and speed of thrombolysis at individual hospitals. Design Computer simulation modelling and machine learning. Setting Seven acute stroke units. Participants Anonymised clinical audit data for 7864 patients. Results Three factors were pivotal in governing thrombolysis use: (1) the proportion of patients with a known stroke onset time (range 44%–73%), (2) pathway speed (for patients arriving within 4 hours of onset: per-hospital median arrival-to-scan ranged from 11 to 56 min; median scan-to-thrombolysis ranged from 21 to 44 min) and (3) predisposition to use thrombolysis (thrombolysis use ranged from 31% to 52% for patients with stroke scanned with 30 min left to administer thrombolysis). A pathway simulation model could predict the potential benefit of improving individual stages of the clinical pathway speed, whereas a machine learning model could predict the benefit of ‘exporting’ clinical decision making from one hospital to another, while allowing for differences in patient population between hospitals. By applying pathway simulation and machine learning together, we found a realistic ceiling of 15%–25% use of thrombolysis across different hospitals and, in the seven hospitals studied, a realistic opportunity to double the number of patients with no significant disability that may be attributed to thrombolysis. Conclusions National clinical audit may be enhanced by a combination of pathway simulation and machine learning, which best allows for an understanding of key levers for improvement in hyperacute stroke pathways, allowing for differences between local patient populations. These models, based on standard clinical audit data, may be applied at scale while providing results at individual hospital level. The models facilitate understanding of variation and levers for improvement in stroke pathways, and help set realistic targets tailored to local populations.

[1]  C. McKevitt,et al.  Effects of Centralizing Acute Stroke Services on Stroke Care Provision in Two Large Metropolitan Areas in England , 2015, Stroke.

[2]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[3]  Ronan A Lyons,et al.  Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, The Lancet.

[4]  ThomasMonks,et al.  Maximizing the Population Benefit From Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2012 .

[5]  J. Saver Time Is Brain—Quantified , 2006, Stroke.

[6]  H. Asadi,et al.  Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction of Acute Ischemic Stroke Post Intra-Arterial Therapy , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Peter Sandercock,et al.  A systematic review of barriers to delivery of thrombolysis for acute stroke. , 2004, Age and ageing.

[8]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Michael Allen,et al.  A framework to accelerate simulation studies of hyperacute stroke systems , 2017 .

[10]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Dual coordinate descent methods for logistic regression and maximum entropy models , 2011, Machine Learning.

[11]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in first stroke incidence, quality of care, and survival: a nationwide registry-based cohort study of 44 million adults in England , 2018, The Lancet. Public health.

[12]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Catherine Perry,et al.  Impact of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas on mortality and length of hospital stay: difference-in-differences analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Atte Meretoja,et al.  Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis , 2012, Neurology.

[15]  A. Parry-Jones,et al.  Care-limiting decisions in acute stroke and association with survival: analyses of UK national quality register data , 2016, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[16]  Geoffrey A. Donnan,et al.  Stroke Thrombolysis: Save a Minute, Save a Day , 2014, Stroke.

[17]  Erik Buskens,et al.  A Simulation-based Approach for Improving Utilization of Thrombolysis in Acute Brain Infarction , 2013, Medical care.

[18]  Erik Buskens,et al.  Centralising and optimising decentralised stroke care systems: a simulation study on short-term costs and effects , 2017, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[19]  Secondary Primary Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) , 2014 .

[20]  M. Koci,et al.  Genetic Variation within the Mx Gene of Commercially Selected Chicken Lines Reveals Multiple Haplotypes, Recombination and a Protein under Selection Pressure , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Weekly variation in health-care quality by day and time of admission: a nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study of acute stroke care , 2016, The Lancet.

[22]  K. Kimura,et al.  FLAIR can estimate the onset time in acute ischemic stroke patients , 2010, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[23]  Yu Cao,et al.  An integrated machine learning approach to stroke prediction , 2010, KDD.

[24]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[25]  Tjerk P. Straatsma,et al.  NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[26]  Martin Pitt,et al.  Maximizing the Population Benefit From Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Modeling Study of In-Hospital Delays , 2012, Stroke.

[27]  M. Stone Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[28]  P. Lyden,et al.  Thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke--not a moment to lose. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Prediction of stroke thrombolysis outcome using CT brain machine learning , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[30]  P. Sandercock,et al.  How many Patients might Receive Thrombolytic Therapy in the Light of the ECASS-3 and IST-3 Data? , 2010, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[31]  V. Feigin,et al.  Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2014, The Lancet.

[32]  G. Fink,et al.  Identifying Neuroimaging Markers of Motor Disability in Acute Stroke by Machine Learning Techniques. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  C. Gerloff,et al.  MRI‐Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2014 .

[35]  E. Dorsey,et al.  United States trends in thrombolysis for older adults with acute ischemic stroke , 2015, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[36]  Eric Manheimer,et al.  Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: time for a rethink? , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Increase in national intravenous thrombolysis rates for ischaemic stroke between 2005 and 2012: is bigger better? , 2016, BMC Neurology.