Presented here is an O(mn$^{2})$ physically concise algorithm (solver) to obtain noniteratively a minimum-norm (m-) solution of the consistent under-/over-determined linear system Ax=b without computing any generalized inverse (g-inverse), where the matrix A is m × n. This m-solution is also the minimum-norm least-squares (mt-) solution of the consistent system. When the system is near-consistent/inconsistent, the algorithm can be used to obtain (i) the g-inversion-free mt-solution of the inconsistent system just by replacing A by A$^{t}$A and b by A$^{t}$b or (ii) the g-inversion-free mt-solution of a consistent system closest (in some sense) to the inconsistent system without modifying/premultiplying both sides of the system by A$^{t}$. It provides an in-built consistency check and an inconsistency index - a measure of degree of inconsistency, and the rank (that provides the information content of the system) of the matrix A. Further, if required, it can identify and prune/weed out redundant (linearly dependent) rows of (A, b), i.e., throw away redundant equations and convert A into a full row-rank matrix, thus potentially reducing the storage requirement, amount of computation and hence errors and computing time, while preserving the complete information of the contradiction-free system. In addition, the solver produces the unique projection operator P that projects the real n-dimensional space orthogonally onto the null space of A and that readily provides a means of computing any number of solutions desired. The solver also produces a relative error bound without computing any kind of g-inverse of A subject to a certain condition. It is also readily amenable to both error-free computation and parallel/vector implementation. In addition, it detects whether the system is unacceptable (excessively inconsistent) and prompts us to check the physical and the mathematical models for a possible reason and consequent correction before we continue further the solution process. A heuristic algorithm is presented, in which two of the outputs of the solver, viz., the solution vector and the projection operator are used as inputs for a nonnegative solution of the system noniteratively in O(mn$^{2}$) operations.
[1]
S. S. Prabhu,et al.
Optimal iterative schemes for computing the Moore-Penrose matrix inverse
,
1976
.
[2]
Jon G. Rokne,et al.
Complex interval arithmetic
,
1971,
CACM.
[3]
R. Penrose.
A Generalized inverse for matrices
,
1955
.
[4]
E. V. Krishnamurthy,et al.
Rank-Augmented LU-Algorithm for Computing Generalized Matrix Inverses
,
1974,
IEEE Transactions on Computers.
[5]
V. Ch. Venkaiah,et al.
A concise algorithm to solve over-/under-determined linear systems
,
1990,
Simul..
[6]
D. Fausett,et al.
A CENTER OF A POLYTOPE: AN EXPOSITORY REVIEW AND A PARALLEL IMPLEMENTATION
,
1993
.
[7]
S. K. Sen,et al.
Solving linear programming problems exactly
,
1997
.
[8]
V. Lakshmikantham,et al.
O(n3) noniterative heuristic algorithm for linear programs with error-free implementation
,
2000,
Appl. Math. Comput..
[9]
V. Ch. Venkaiah,et al.
A shrinking polytope method for linear programming
,
1996,
Neural Parallel Sci. Comput..
[10]
V. Lakshmikantham,et al.
Vectors versus matrices: p-inversion, cryptographic application, and vector implementation
,
1996,
Neural Parallel Sci. Comput..
[11]
M. K. Jain,et al.
Solving linear differential equations as a minimum norm least squares problem with error-bounds
,
2000,
Int. J. Comput. Math..
[12]
E. V. Krishnamurthy,et al.
Methods and Applications of Error-Free Computation
,
1984,
Texts and Monographs in Computer Science.