Fast X-ray tomography for the quantification of the bubbling-, turbulent- and fast fluidization-flow regimes and void structures

Abstract Multiple fluidization regimes were studied using X-ray tomography. Geldart B sand particles were used in a 14 cm (ID) column with a dual cyclone return system. Cross sectional solids concentration (ϕ) was measured and the time averaged ϕ ( ϕ ¯ ) decreased with velocity and axial height except in the turbulent regime where ϕ ¯ remained constant. Radial profiles of ϕ ¯ decreased to the centre, while all turbulent regime velocities resulted in similar radial ϕ ¯ profiles. Results confirm the bubbling-turbulent transition velocity (Uc) determined from pressure fluctuations is a reliable quantification technique. The system exhibited slugging behaviour at higher bubbling regime velocities with voids taking on cylindrical shapes. Turbulent regime voids were characterised by elongated cylinders with diameters slightly less than the bubbling regime’s slugs or fast fluidization regime’s core annulus. Distribution curves of the ϕ signal indicated a distinct dense phase in the bubbling and turbulent regime with a velocity independent solid concentration. Void velocity analysis suggested that the bubble linking algorithm was unable to detect fast rising voids at higher velocities.

[1]  Jesse Zhu,et al.  Detailed measurements of flow structure inside a dense gas–solids fluidized bed , 2008 .

[2]  J. Chaouki,et al.  Traveling column for comparison of invasive and non-invasive fluidization voidage measurement techniques , 2013 .

[3]  Yassir Makkawi,et al.  Electrical capacitance tomography for conventional fluidized bed measurements - remarks on the measuring technique , 2004 .

[4]  J. R. Ommen,et al.  Bubble characterization in a fluidized bed by means of optical probes , 2012 .

[5]  J. R. Ommen,et al.  Effects of pressure and fines content on bubble diameter in a fluidized bed studied using fast X-ray tomography , 2012 .

[6]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Gas and solids mixing in a turbulent fluidized bed , 2002 .

[7]  Uwe Hampel,et al.  Ultrafast X-ray computed tomography for the analysis of gas–solid fluidized beds , 2012 .

[8]  R. F. Mudde,et al.  Bubbles in a fluidized bed: A fast X‐ray scanner , 2011 .

[9]  R. Mudde.  Advanced measurement techniques for GLS reactors , 2010 .

[10]  R. Mudde.  Double X-ray Tomography of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed , 2010 .

[11]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Bed nonhomogeneity in turbulent gas‐solid fluidization , 2003 .

[12]  Yassir Makkawi,et al.  Fluidization regimes in a conventional fluidized bed characterized by means of electrical capacitance tomography , 2002 .

[13]  Hsiaotao Bi,et al.  Hydrodynamics of turbulent fluidized beds of different diameters , 2004 .

[14]  J. Arnaldos,et al.  Prediction of transition velocities and hydrodynamical regimes in fluidized beds , 1996 .

[15]  Morten Christian Melaaen,et al.  A comparative study between electrical capacitance tomography and time-resolved X-ray tomography , 2013 .

[16]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Non-intrusive determination of bubble and slug length scales in fluidized beds by decomposition of the power spectral density of pressure time series , 2002 .

[17]  Robert F. Mudde,et al.  Effect of Distributor Design on the Bottom Zone Hydrodynamics in a Fluidized Bed Dryer Using 1-D X-ray Densitometry Imaging , 2009 .

[18]  H. Bi,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Review of Gas-Solid Turbulent Fluidization , 2000 .

[19]  R. Mudde,et al.  Time-resolved X-ray tomography of a fluidized bed , 2010 .

[20]  Joseph N. Gray,et al.  An X-ray system for visualizing fluid flows , 2008 .