Simultaneous right and left heart real-time, free-breathing CMR flow quantification identifies constrictive physiology.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a novel cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) real-time phase contrast (RT-PC) flow measurement technique to reveal the discordant respirophasic changes in mitral and tricuspid valve in flow indicative of the abnormal hemodynamics seen in constrictive pericarditis (CP). BACKGROUND Definitive diagnosis of CP requires identification of constrictive hemodynamics with or without pericardial thickening. CMR to date has primarily provided morphological assessment of the pericardium. METHODS Sixteen patients (age 57 ± 13 years) undergoing CMR to assess known or suspected CP and 10 controls underwent RT-PC that acquired simultaneous mitral valve and tricuspid valve inflow velocities over 10 s of unrestricted breathing. The diagnosis of CP was confirmed via clinical history, diagnostic imaging, cardiac catheterization, intraoperative findings, and histopathology. RESULTS Ten patients had CP, all with increased pericardial thickness (6.2 ± 1.0 mm). RT-PC imaging demonstrated discordant respirophasic changes in atrioventricular valve inflow velocities in all CP patients, with mean ± SD mitral valve and tricuspid valve inflow velocity variation of 46 ± 20% and 60 ± 15%, respectively, compared with 16 ± 8% and 24 ± 11% in patients without CP (p < 0.004 vs. patients with CP for both) and 17 ± 5% and 31 ± 13% in controls (p < 0.001 vs. patients with CP for both). There was no difference in atrioventricular valve inflow velocity variation between patients without CP compared with controls (p > 0.3 for both). Respiratory variation exceeding 25% across the mitral valve yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 100%, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 1.0 to detect CP physiology. Using a cutoff of 45%, variation of transtricuspid valve velocity had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 88%, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.98. CONCLUSIONS Accentuated and discordant respirophasic changes in mitral valve and tricuspid valve inflow velocities characteristic of CP can be identified noninvasively with RT-PC CMR. When incorporated into existing CMR protocols for imaging pericardial morphology, RT-PC CMR provides important hemodynamic evidence with which to make a definite diagnosis of CP.

[1]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: a diagnostic dilemma , 2001, Heart.

[2]  H. Schaff,et al.  Early and late results of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  M. Desai,et al.  The Role of Multimodality Imaging in the Management of Pericardial Disease , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  Hung-Yu Lin REAL-TIME FLOW QUANTIFICATION TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOVASCULAR MRI APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[5]  L. Sinak,et al.  Pericardial disease: diagnosis and management. , 2010, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[6]  C. Higgins,et al.  Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[7]  A. Tajik,et al.  Value of dynamic respiratory changes in left and right ventricular pressures for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. , 1996, Circulation.

[8]  J. Seward,et al.  Annulus Paradoxus: Transmitral Flow Velocity to Mitral Annular Velocity Ratio Is Inversely Proportional to Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Patients With Constrictive Pericarditis , 2001, Circulation.

[9]  A. Tajik,et al.  Constrictive Pericarditis in 26 Patients With Histologically Normal Pericardial Thickness , 2003, Circulation.

[10]  F H Epstein,et al.  Adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE) † , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  A J Tajik,et al.  Pericardial thickness measured with transesophageal echocardiography: feasibility and potential clinical usefulness. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  B. Giorgi,et al.  Clinically suspected constrictive pericarditis: MR imaging assessment of ventricular septal motion and configuration in patients and healthy subjects. , 2003, Radiology.

[13]  R L Popp,et al.  Differentiation of Constrictive Pericarditis and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy by Doppler Echocardiography , 1989, Circulation.

[14]  Shared velocity encoding (SVE): a new method for real-time velocity measurement with high temporal resolution , 2009, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[15]  Hancock Ew Differential diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis , 2001 .

[16]  J. Oh,et al.  Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Marco Francone,et al.  Real‐time cine MRI of ventricular septal motion: A novel approach to assess ventricular coupling , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  J. Hung,et al.  Multimodality imaging of pericardial diseases. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[19]  Marco Francone,et al.  Assessment of ventricular coupling with real-time cine MRI and its value to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy , 2006, European Radiology.

[20]  Richard D. White,et al.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. , 2010, Circulation.

[21]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. , 2010, Circulation.

[22]  J. Seward,et al.  Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.