The impact of latency on perceptual judgments and motor performance in closed-loop interaction in virtual reality

Latency between a user's movement and visual feedback is inevitable in every Virtual Reality application, as signal transmission and processing take time. Unfortunately, a high end-to-end latency impairs perception and motor performance. While it is possible to reduce feedback delay to tens of milliseconds, these delays will never completely vanish. Currently, there is a gap in literature regarding the impact of feedback delays on perception and motor performance as well as on their interplay in virtual environments employing full-body avatars. With the present study at hand, we address this gap by performing a systematic investigation of different levels of delay across a variety of perceptual and motor tasks during full-body action inside a Cave Automatic Virtual Environment. We presented participants with their virtual mirror image, which responded to their actions with feedback delays ranging from 45 to 350 ms. We measured the impact of these delays on motor performance, sense of agency, sense of body ownership and simultaneity perception by means of psychophysical procedures. Furthermore, we looked at interaction effects between these aspects to identify possible dependencies. The results show that motor performance and simultaneity perception are affected by latencies above 75 ms. Although sense of agency and body ownership only decline at a latency higher than 125 ms, and deteriorate for a latency greater than 300 ms, they do not break down completely even at the highest tested delay. Interestingly, participants perceptually infer the presence of delays more from their motor error in the task than from the actual level of delay. Whether or not participants notice a delay in a virtual environment might therefore depend on the motor task and their performance rather than on the actual delay.

[1]  J. Hupé,et al.  The time windows of the sense of agency , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[2]  C. Frith,et al.  Experiencing Oneself vs Another Person as Being the Cause of an Action: The Neural Correlates of the Experience of Agency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Alessandro Moscatelli,et al.  Modeling psychophysical data at the population-level: the generalized linear mixed model. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[5]  M. Whitton,et al.  Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[6]  Andriy Pavlovych,et al.  Target following performance in the presence of latency, jitter, and signal dropouts , 2011, Graphics Interface.

[7]  Sophie Jörg,et al.  How responsiveness affects players' perception in digital games , 2012, SAP.

[8]  M. Ernst,et al.  Effects can precede their cause in the sense of agency , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Reaching for objects in VR displays: lag and frame rate , 1994, TCHI.

[10]  Alex Perdomo,et al.  Applying latency to half of a self-avatar's body to change real walking patterns , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[11]  John Quarles,et al.  Latency and avatars in Virtual Environments and the effects on gait for persons with mobility impairments , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[12]  Michael I. Hill,et al.  Generalizeability of Latency Detection in a Variety of Virtual Environments , 2004 .

[13]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Marc O. Ernst,et al.  Correlation detection as a general mechanism for multisensory integration , 2016, Nature Communications.

[15]  P. Haggard,et al.  Sense of Agency Primes Manual Motor Responses , 2009, Perception.

[16]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[17]  S. Nishida,et al.  The sense of agency is action–effect causality perception based on cross-modal grouping , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Marieke Rohde,et al.  Time, agency, and sensory feedback delays during action , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[19]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity , 2004, APGV '04.

[20]  M. Ernst,et al.  Predictability is necessary for closed-loop visual feedback delay adaptation. , 2014, Journal of Vision.

[21]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Sensorimotor temporal recalibration within and across limbs. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Tomohisa Asai,et al.  Agency elicits body-ownership: proprioceptive drift toward a synchronously acting external proxy , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The effects of network delays on group work in real-time groupware , 2001, ECSCW.

[24]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A Multimodal System for Real-Time Action Instruction in Motor Skill Learning , 2015, ICMI.

[25]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[26]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Realizing a low-latency virtual reality environment for motor learning , 2015, VRST.

[27]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[28]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Telepresence, time delay and adaptation , 1991 .

[29]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[30]  Marc Erich Latoschik,et al.  Reducing application-stage latencies of interprocess communication techniques for real-time interactive systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[31]  Tomohisa Asai,et al.  Dissociation of agency and body ownership following visuomotor temporal recalibration , 2015, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[32]  Martin Mauve,et al.  Local-lag and timewarp: providing consistency for replicated continuous applications , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[33]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[34]  S. Gallagher Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Mar González-Franco,et al.  The contribution of real-time mirror reflections of motor actions on virtual body ownership in an immersive virtual environment , 2010, 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR).

[36]  Kyoung Shin Park,et al.  Effects of network characteristics on human performance in a collaborative virtual environment , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[37]  Marc Erich Latoschik,et al.  Avatar embodiment realism and virtual fitness training , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[38]  Richard H. Y. So,et al.  Effects of Hand Movement Lag on Discrete Manual Control Tasks in Virtual Environements , 1999 .

[39]  William R. Ferrell,et al.  Remote manipulation with transmission delay. , 1965 .

[40]  Robert J. Teather,et al.  Effects of tracking technology, latency, and spatial jitter on object movement , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces.

[41]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[42]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[43]  S. Ellis Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments , 1991 .

[44]  Anthony Steed,et al.  The Effects of Low Latency on Pointing and Steering Tasks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[45]  Ragnhild Eg,et al.  Can gamers detect cloud delay? , 2014, 2014 13th Annual Workshop on Network and Systems Support for Games.

[46]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .