Ultrasonographic subepidermal low‐echogenic band, dependence of age and body site
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Hönigsmann,et al. Objective assessment of photoageing effects using high‐frequency ultrasound in PUVA‐treated psoriasis patients , 2002, The British journal of dermatology.
[2] B. Querleux,et al. In vivo cross-sectional ultrasonic imaging of human skin. , 1988, Dermatologica.
[3] J. Fluhr,et al. Cleansing, dehydrating, barrier‐damaging and irritating hyperaemising effect of four detergent brands: comparative studies using standardised washing models , 2004, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.
[4] Takashi Kitahara,et al. Age-Related Alterations of Echogenicity in Japanese Skin , 2000, Dermatology.
[5] B. Querleux,et al. Assessment of aging of the human skin by in vivo ultrasonic imaging. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.
[6] T J Ryan,et al. The effect of mechanical forces (vibration or external compression) on the dermal water content of the upper dermis and epidermis, assessed by high frequency ultrasound. , 2001, Journal of tissue viability.
[7] Gniadecka,et al. Quantitative evaluation of chronological ageing and photoageing in vivo: studies on skin echogenicity and thickness , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.
[8] S. Seidenari,et al. Echographic evaluation with image analysis of histamine-induced wheals. , 1994, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.
[9] J Serup,et al. High‐frequency ultrasound characterization of normal skin. Skin thickness and echographic density of 22 anatomical sites , 1995, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.
[10] S Seidenari,et al. Echographic evaluation with image analysis of normal skin: variations according to age and sex. , 1994, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.
[11] J. Welzel,et al. Influence of body water distribution on skin thickness: measurements using high‐frequency ultrasound , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.
[12] G Pellacani,et al. Variations in facial skin thickness and echogenicity with site and age. , 1999, Acta dermato-venereologica.
[13] J Serup,et al. Ultrasound structure and digital image analysis of the subepidermal low echogenic band in aged human skin: diurnal changes and interindividual variability. , 1994, The Journal of investigative dermatology.
[14] P. Altmeyer,et al. Assessment of actinic skin damage by 20-MHz sonography. , 1994, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.
[15] Marianne Elholm Kieffer,et al. Imedeen® in the treatment of photoaged skin: an efficacy and safety trial over 12 months 1 , 1998, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.
[16] T. Fitzpatrick. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. , 1988, Archives of dermatology.
[17] J. Lévêque,et al. Noninvasive measurement of the effect of lifetime exposure to the sun on the aged skin. , 1994, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.
[18] M. Gniadecka,et al. Effects of ageing on dermal echogenicity , 2001, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.