Ability to use duplex US to quantify internal carotid arterial stenoses: fact or fiction?

PURPOSE To determine if duplex ultrasonography (US) can help predict the degree of internal carotid arterial (ICA) stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the ratio of the PSV in the ICA to that in the ipsilateral common carotid artery (VICA/VCCA) were compared with the degree of arteriographically measured stenosis. ICAs were arteriographically subgrouped at 10% incremental levels of stenosis and broader ranges. Mean PSV, VICA/VCCA, and SDs were calculated for each category. Histograms showing the numbers of stenotic ICAs in subgroups and for vessels with stenoses of greater than or equal to or less than 70% narrowing were constructed. The number of vessels correctly subgrouped with typical Doppler US thresholds was calculated. RESULTS Mean PSV and VICA/VCCA increased with stenosis level (P < .01); SDs were wide. Histograms showed Doppler US values in the central groups across all disease levels. Histograms differentiating at least or less than 70% stenosis showed minimal overlap. PSV and VICA/VCCA helped classify, respectively, 185 and 181 of 204 vessels with stenoses of less than 50%, 15 and 21 of 46 vessels with stenoses of 50%-69%, and 73 and 67 of 84 vessels with stenoses of 70% or greater. When classifying stenoses as 69% or less or 70% or more, PSV and VICA/VCCA were correct in 90.6% and 90.3% of vessels. CONCLUSION Doppler US is excellent for classifying stenoses as above or below a single degree of severity but does not function well in stenosis subclassification.

[1]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  D. Sacks,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for carotid duplex sonography. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  P. Chikos,et al.  Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning for Disease of the Carotid Artery , 1981, Circulation.

[4]  Beatrice Madrazo,et al.  PVO 3208 Duplex diagnostic criteria: A survey of ICAVL accredited laboratories , 1997 .

[5]  S N Cohen,et al.  Doppler sonographic parameters for detection of carotid stenosis: is there an optimum method for their selection? , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  J. Sackett,et al.  Correlation of high-resolution, B-mode and continuous-wave Doppler sonography with arteriography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis. , 1983, Radiology.

[7]  F. Lexa,et al.  Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. , 1996, Stroke.

[8]  D S Sumner,et al.  Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  P. Cooperberg,et al.  Duplex ultrasonography criteria for internal carotid stenosis of more than 70% diameter: angiographic correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. , 1995, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[10]  K. W. Marich,et al.  Carotid duplex sonography: a multicenter recommendation for standardized imaging and Doppler criteria. , 1988, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  D E Strandness,et al.  Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  D. Schellinger,et al.  Duplex carotid sonography: criteria for stenosis, accuracy, and pitfalls. , 1985, Radiology.

[13]  M. Neale,et al.  Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  J. Eidt,et al.  Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial? , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  Interobserver agreement for 10% categories of angiographic carotid stenosis. , 1997, Stroke.

[16]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  G. Moneta,et al.  Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  F. Lexa,et al.  Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  W. Powers,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic disease. , 1996, Stroke.

[20]  E. Feldmann,et al.  Performance of carotid ultrasound in evaluating candidates for carotid endarterectomy is optimized by an approach based on clinical outcome rather than accuracy. , 1996, Stroke.

[21]  R. Edelman,et al.  Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients. , 1995, JAMA.

[22]  M G Hunink,et al.  Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  B. Carroll,et al.  Duplex ultrasound scanning of the carotid arteries with velocity spectrum analysis. , 1983, Radiology.