The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has been heavily criticized over decades. This opinion piece argues that the JIF should not be demonized. It still can be employed for research evaluation purposes by carefully considering the context and academic environment.

[1]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Ewen Callaway,et al.  Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories , 2005, ASIST.

[4]  Armen Yuri Gasparyan,et al.  Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication , 2015, Journal of Korean medical science.

[5]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Fuyuki Yoshikane,et al.  Factors affecting citation rates of research articles , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Group‐based trajectory modeling (GBTM) of citations in scholarly literature: Dynamic qualities of “transient” and “sticky knowledge claims” , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions , 2016, bioRxiv.

[10]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[11]  Jian Wang,et al.  Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation , 2013, Scientometrics.

[12]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics , 2012, Rheumatology International.

[13]  Janet Kleber,et al.  Sometimes the impact factor outshines the H index , 2008, Retrovirology.

[14]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..