Computer modeling to predict effects of implant malpositioning during TKA.

Computer-assisted surgery has focused on alignment of implants and soft tissue balancing but the end results during surgery as they pertain to long-term function of the implants are not yet realized. One parameter that continues to be variable despite the use of computer navigation is the placement of the implants in the transverse plane. The objective of this study was to determine whether implant and anatomic registrations could be used in a computer model (LifeMOD/KneeSIM, LifeModeler, Inc., San Clemente, California) to show differences in the resulting contact patterns of the medial and lateral condyles of the polyethylene insert. The simulations included tibiofemoral and patellofemoral contact, passive soft tissue (medial and lateral collateral, and posterior cruciate ligaments, as well as the capsular tissues), and active muscle elements (quadriceps and hamstrings). Components of a fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee (Columbus knee system; B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) were imported into the model. The systems were subjected to one 60-second cycle of a lunge. Both the femoral and the tibial components were positioned in 5° of internal or external rotation in varying combinations and the resulting kinematics analyzed. The resulting kinematics showed variations in anteroposterior translation of the lateral and medial femoral condyles that resembled several of those reported in the literature for individual patients with a cruciate-retaining knee implant system.

[1]  Michael Nogler,et al.  Navigation Improves Accuracy of Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  A. Mannion,et al.  The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty , 2009, Arthritis research & therapy.

[3]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  S. Banks,et al.  In vivo deep-flexion kinematics in patients with posterior-cruciate retaining and anterior-cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Robert A Siston,et al.  Averaging different alignment axes improves femoral rotational alignment in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Alex Stacoff,et al.  Biomechanical background and clinical observations of rotational malalignment in TKA: literature review and consequences. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  Frederick W Werner,et al.  The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  R. Barrack,et al.  Component Rotation and Anterior Knee Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Todd Johnson,et al.  Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Peter F. M. Choong,et al.  Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  J. J. Jacobs,et al.  Malrotation Causing Patellofemoral Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  L. Sensi,et al.  Rotational Position of Femoral and Tibial Components in TKA Using the Femoral Transepicondylar Axis , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  J P Cobb,et al.  The anatomical tibial axis: reliable rotational orientation in knee replacement. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  Masahiro Kurosaka,et al.  In vivo comparison of knee kinematics before and after high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  A. Davis,et al.  Outcomes of total joint arthroplasty in academic versus community hospitals. , 2009, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[16]  Parameter identification of the human lower limb under dynamic, transient torsional loading. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  N. Giori,et al.  Rotational References for Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Components Change with Level of Resection , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .

[20]  R. Komistek,et al.  High-flexion TKA Designs: What Are Their In Vivo Contact Mechanics? , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  T. Fehring Rotational Malalignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  L. Whiteside,et al.  The Anteroposterior Axis for Femoral Rotational Alignment in Valgus Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.