Hierarchical clustering identifies hub nodes in a model of resting-state brain activity

A novel clustering algorithm is presented for analyzing the temporal dynamics of synchronization in networks of coupled oscillators and applied to a model of resting-state brain activity. Connectivity in the model is based on a human-brain structural connectivity matrix derived from diffusion tensor imaging tractography. We find a strong correspondence between areas of high synchronization and highly connected “hub” nodes, anatomical regions forming the structural core of the network linking all areas of the brain. Such models have the potential to increase our understanding of the constraints placed on brain function by underlying anatomical structure.

[1]  A. Seth,et al.  Causal density and integrated information as measures of conscious level , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  M. Shanahan.  Metastable chimera states in community-structured oscillator networks. , 2009, Chaos.

[3]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Can structure predict function in the human brain? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[6]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[7]  P. Fries.  Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Rui Xu,et al.  Survey of clustering algorithms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[9]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[10]  C. J. Honeya,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009 .

[11]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Kahn,et al.  Functionally linked resting‐state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Qiang Xu,et al.  Small-world directed networks in the human brain: Multivariate Granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[14]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[15]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Detecting rich-club ordering in complex networks , 2006, physics/0602134.

[16]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Yoshiki Kuramoto,et al.  Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence , 1984, Springer Series in Synergetics.

[18]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Greicius,et al.  Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity , 2009, Brain Structure and Function.

[20]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[22]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[23]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[24]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.