Bayesian Landmark-based Shape Analysis of Tumor Pathology Images

Medical imaging is a form of technology that has revolutionized the medical field in the past century. In addition to radiology imaging of tumor tissues, digital pathology imaging, which captures histological details in high spatial resolution, is fast becoming a routine clinical procedure for cancer diagnosis support and treatment planning. Recent developments in deep-learning methods facilitate the segmentation of tumor regions at almost the cellular level from digital pathology images. The traditional shape features that were developed for characterizing tumor boundary roughness in radiology are not applicable. Reliable statistical approaches to modeling tumor shape in pathology images are in urgent need. In this paper, we consider the problem of modeling a tumor boundary with a closed polygonal chain. A Bayesian landmark-based shape analysis (BayesLASA) model is proposed to partition the polygonal chain into mutually exclusive segments to quantify the boundary roughness piecewise. Our fully Bayesian inference framework provides uncertainty estimates of both the number and locations of landmarks. The BayesLASA outperforms a recently developed landmark detection model for planar elastic curves in terms of accuracy and efficiency. We demonstrate how this model-based analysis can lead to sharper inferences than ordinary approaches through a case study on the 246 pathology images from 143 non-small cell lung cancer patients. The case study shows that the heterogeneity of tumor boundary roughness predicts patient prognosis (p-value < 0.001). This statistical methodology not only presents a new model for characterizing a digitized object's shape features by using its landmarks, but also provides a new perspective for understanding the role of tumor surface in cancer progression.

[1]  Katarina Domijan A Bayesian Method for Automatic Landmark Detection in Segmented Images , 2005 .

[2]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software , 2011, Bioinform..

[3]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Comprehensive Computational Pathological Image Analysis Predicts Lung Cancer Prognosis , 2017, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[4]  B. Matthews Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  Karupppasamy Subburaj,et al.  3D Shape Reasoning for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks , 2008 .

[6]  Wei Wang,et al.  Enhanced roughness index for breast cancer benign/malignant measurement using Gaussian mixture model , 2013, RACS.

[7]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[8]  Sebastian Kurtek,et al.  Automatic Detection and Uncertainty Quantification of Landmarks on Elastic Curves , 2019, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[9]  William M. Rand,et al.  Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods , 1971 .

[10]  Maria Kallergi,et al.  Effects of image resolution and segmentation method on automated mammographic mass shape classification , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Reza Safdari,et al.  Advances in Optimal Detection of Cancer by Image Processing; Experience with Lung and Breast Cancers. , 2015, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[12]  Yutong Liu,et al.  Landmark Optimization Using Local Curvature for Point-Based Nonlinear Rodent Brain Image Registration , 2011, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[13]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, The Lancet.

[14]  P. Müller,et al.  Bayesian inference for gene expression and proteomics , 2006 .

[15]  Christakis Constantinides Assessment of Cellular and Organ Function and Dysfunction using Direct and Derived MRI Methodologies , 2016 .

[16]  Corbin E. Meacham,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity , 2013, Nature.

[17]  M. L. Fravolini,et al.  Evaluation of Shape and Textural Features from CT as Prognostic Biomarkers in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2018, Anticancer research.

[18]  Mark J. Embrechts,et al.  On the Use of the Adjusted Rand Index as a Metric for Evaluating Supervised Classification , 2009, ICANN.

[19]  T. Fearn,et al.  Multivariate Bayesian variable selection and prediction , 1998 .

[20]  Martin D. Fox,et al.  Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[21]  M. Vannucci,et al.  Bayesian Variable Selection in Clustering High-Dimensional Data , 2005 .

[22]  Pawel Stepien,et al.  Simple fractal method of assessment of histological images for application in medical diagnostics , 2010, Nonlinear biomedical physics.

[23]  F Grizzi,et al.  Fractal analysis. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  S. Agaian,et al.  Initial Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Radiologic Assessment for Renal Mass Edge Detection as an Indication of Tumor Roughness to Predict Renal Cancer Subtypes , 2019, Advances in Urology.

[25]  Hongliang Ren,et al.  Evaluation of tumor shape features for overall survival prognosis in glioblastoma multiforme patients. , 2019, Surgical oncology.

[26]  Dirk Eddelbuettel,et al.  Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ Integration , 2011 .

[27]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Application of shape analysis to mammographic calcifications , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[28]  Ce Zhang,et al.  Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features , 2016, Nature Communications.

[29]  A. Shaw,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies , 2018, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[30]  Nikos Dimitropoulos,et al.  Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes , 2007, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[31]  F. Markowetz,et al.  Quantitative Image Analysis of Cellular Heterogeneity in Breast Tumors Complements Genomic Profiling , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[32]  M. Gurcan,et al.  Digital pathology and artificial intelligence. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[33]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[34]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[35]  Eric D. Claus,et al.  A comparison of automated and manual co-registration for magnetoencephalography , 2019, bioRxiv.

[36]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Multifeature Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  Chris Bakal,et al.  RNAi screens for Rho GTPase regulators of cell shape and YAP/TAZ localisation in triple negative breast cancer , 2017, Scientific Data.

[38]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  D. Foran,et al.  Pathology Imaging Informatics for Clinical Practice and Investigative and Translational Research. , 2012, North American journal of medicine & science.

[40]  Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  MRI image analysis methods and applications: an algorithmic perspective using brain tumors as an exemplar , 2020, Neuro-oncology advances.

[41]  Sayan Mukherjee,et al.  Functional Data Analysis using a Topological Summary Statistic: the Smooth Euler Characteristic Transform , 2016 .

[42]  Javad Haddadnia,et al.  Assessment of a novel computer aided mass diagnosis system in mammograms , 2016 .

[43]  A. Brú,et al.  Fractal analysis and tumour growth , 2008, Math. Comput. Model..

[44]  Shuo-Yen Robert Li,et al.  An MCMC algorithm for detecting short adjacent repeats shared by multiple sequences , 2011, Bioinform..

[45]  Ajmal S. Mian,et al.  Shape-based automatic detection of a large number of 3D facial landmarks , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[46]  C. Compton,et al.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[47]  P. Lambin,et al.  Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[48]  Koichi Nagata,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT. , 2014, World journal of gastroenterology.

[49]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms. , 1996, Medical physics.

[50]  A. Gazdar,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of lung cancer pathology images to discover tumor shape and boundary features that predict survival outcome , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[51]  Andrés Larroza,et al.  Texture Analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Review and Considerations for Future Applications , 2016 .

[52]  E. George,et al.  APPROACHES FOR BAYESIAN VARIABLE SELECTION , 1997 .

[53]  M. Cugmas,et al.  On comparing partitions , 2015 .