The first step in using a robot in brain injury rehabilitation: patients’ and health-care professionals’ perspective

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the usability of a mobile telepresence robot (MTR) in a hospital training apartment (HTA). The MTR was manoeuvred remotely and was used for communication when assessing independent living skills, and for security monitoring of cognitively impaired patients. Method: Occupational therapists (OTs) and nurses received training in how to use the MTR. The nurses completed a questionnaire regarding their expectations of using the MTR. OTs and patients staying in the HTA were interviewed about their experiences of the MTR. Interviews and questionnaires were analysed qualitatively. Results: The HTA patients were very satisfied with the MTR. The OTs and nurses reported generally positive experiences. The OT’s found that assessment via the MTR was more neutral than being physically present. However, the use of the MTR implied considerable difficulties for health-care professionals. The main obstacle for the nurses was the need for fast and easy access in emergency situations while protecting the patients’ integrity. Conclusions: The results indicate that the MTR could be a useful tool to support daily living skills and safety monitoring of HTA patients. However, when designing technology for multiple users, such as health-care professionals, the needs of all users, their routines and support services involved, should also be considered. Implications for Rehabilitation A mobile telepresence robot (MTR) can be a useful tool for assessments and communication in rehabilitation. The design of the robot has to allow easy use by remote users, particularly in emergency situations. When designing MTRs the needs of ALL users have to be taken into consideration.

[1]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Health Professionals' Attitudes about Robotic Telepresence Technology , 2011 .

[2]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: Acceptance, Benefits, and Concerns , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Ingrid Zukerman,et al.  In-home monitoring of older adults with vision impairment: exploring patients', caregivers' and professionals' views , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  K. Tham,et al.  A training apartment with electronic aids to daily living: lived experiences of persons with brain damage. , 2004, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Towards a methodology for longitudinal evaluation of social robotic telepresence for elderly , 2011, HRI 2011.

[6]  Håkan Eftring,et al.  Would Granny Let an Assistive Robot into Her Home? , 2012, ICSR.

[7]  Peter Kearns,et al.  Reactions to a remote-controlled video-communication robot in seniors' homes: a pilot study of feasibility and acceptance. , 2012, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[8]  I. Boman,et al.  A training apartment with a set of electronic memory aids for patients with cognitive problems , 2010, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[9]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[10]  J. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design , 2015 .

[11]  Todd R. Johnson,et al.  A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[12]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence , 2013, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[14]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Inclusive design toolkit , 2007 .

[15]  Antoine Piau,et al.  Aging society and gerontechnology: A solution for an independent living? , 2013, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.