Effect of Ambulatory 24-Hour Esophageal pH Monitoring on Reflux-Provoking Activities

Ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring isconsidered the gold standard for diagnosinggastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The currentapproach is to encourage patients to pursue theireveryday activity in order to obtain near-physiologicalrecordings. However, the effect of the test itself onreflux-provoking activities has never been evaluated.Thus, the aim of our study was to assess daily foodconsumption, habits, symptoms, sleep, and perceivedexperience of patients undergoing pH testing as comparedto an off test (normal) day. Patients reported type andtime spent in each activity pursued, food ingested and length of each meal, habits, frequency andseverity of GERD and other related symptoms, sleepdisturbances, side effects, and overall perceivedexperience during pH testing and four weeks later,during a normal day. Fifty-four patients enrolled. pHtesting significantly reduced time spent being active,number of meals and cups of coffee consumed, andfrequency of GERD symptoms. Almost half of the patients reported having dysphagia during the test. Mostpatients experienced side effects and stated that thetest bothered them most of the time. In conclusion, pHtesting has a significant effect on decreasing reflux-provoking activities — patientstend to assume a more sedentary lifestyle. This mayinfluence the reliability of the test as a physiologicmeasure of acid reflux.

[1]  J. Richter,et al.  Prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. , 1990, American Journal of Medicine.

[2]  C. Pope,et al.  Extended esophageal pH monitoring. An analysis of the literature and assessment of its role in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux. , 1989, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[3]  T. Layden,et al.  Limitations of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in the hospital setting. , 1985, Gastroenterology.

[4]  J. Richter,et al.  Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring , 1988, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[5]  D. McGee,et al.  Age- and gender-related differences in 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring of normal subjects , 1993, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[6]  T R DeMeester,et al.  Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. , 1992, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  J. Behar,et al.  Evaluation of esophageal tests in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. , 1976, Gastroenterology.

[8]  R. Sampliner,et al.  The clinical and economic value of a short course of omeprazole in patients with noncardiac chest pain. , 1998, Gastroenterology.

[9]  J. de Caestecker,et al.  Daytime gastro-oesophageal reflux is important in oesophagitis. , 1987, Gut.

[10]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  A new questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease. , 1994, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  C. Stanciu,et al.  Correlation between manometric and pH tests for gastro-oesophageal reflux. , 1977, Gut.

[12]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Omeprazole as a diagnostic tool in gastroesophageal reflux disease. , 1997, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[13]  J. Richter,et al.  Gastroesophageal Reflux: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy , 1982 .

[14]  L. Grande,et al.  Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring systems in diagnosis og gastroesophageal reflux disease , 1993, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.