Comparing the Effects of Signal Noise on Pattern Recognition and Linear Regression-Based Myoelectric Controllers

Myoelectric pattern recognition using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifiers has been a wellestablished control method for upper limb prostheses for many years. More recently, linear regression (LR) controllers have been proposed as an alternative solution due to their ability to control multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) simultaneously. The aim of this experiment was to compare the online performance of LDA and LR control systems under three electromyographic (EMG) signal conditions: baseline, noise in all channels, and noise in a single channel. To simulate the last two conditions, different levels of Gaussian noise were added to the EMG signals. Completion rate, path efficiency, dwelling time, and completion time were computed after virtual Fitts' Law tasks. While both controllers were significantly affected by the lowest noise levels, we found no significant differences between the controllers under the baseline and all-channel noise conditions. However, the LDA controller outperformed the LR controller in the single-channel noise condition. Therefore, while both controllers are comparable in most cases, the added complexity of simultaneous control affects an LR controller's performance under certain noise conditions. Based on these results, neither control system should be dismissed in future developments.

[1]  D. Farina,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Regression Techniques for Simultaneous and Proportional Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Dario Farina,et al.  User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Todd A Kuiken,et al.  Real-time simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control using intramuscular EMG , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  A strategy for minimizing the effect of misclassifications during real time pattern recognition myoelectric control , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Control of Powered Upper Limb Prostheses , 2004 .

[7]  Ann M. Simon,et al.  A comparison of proportional control methods for pattern recognition control , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Dario Farina,et al.  Intuitive, Online, Simultaneous, and Proportional Myoelectric Control Over Two Degrees-of-Freedom in Upper Limb Amputees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Dario Farina,et al.  Myoelectric Control of Artificial Limbs¿Is There a Need to Change Focus? [In the Spotlight] , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[10]  Edward D Lemaire,et al.  Two-degree-of-freedom powered prosthetic wrist. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Classification of Simultaneous Movements Using Surface EMG Pattern Recognition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Levi J Hargrove,et al.  A real-time comparison between direct control, sequential pattern recognition control and simultaneous pattern recognition control using a Fitts’ law style assessment procedure , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Evaluation of Linear Regression Simultaneous Myoelectric Control Using Intramuscular EMG , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  M. Swiontkowski Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms , 2010 .

[15]  R. Kirsch,et al.  Evaluation of head orientation and neck muscle EMG signals as three-dimensional command sources , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[16]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.