Creativity and dysfunction in strategic processes : the case of scenario planning

This paper attempts to open up a new line of enquiry into the dysfunctions of creativity within strategic processes. Generally, the impact and results of introducing creativity (and innovation) into organisational life are perceived to be wholesome and beneficial. But recent research in the area of organisational psychology has documented a ‘dark’ side to its introduction, e.g., low employee morale, stress, theft, sabotage, destructive conflict. Learning from this work and shifting the domain to strategic management, this paper focuses on scenario planning—a strategy process widely regarded by participants and facilitators as creative and innovative in structure, content and output. First, the creative credentials of the process are established with reference to the literature and definitions from the creative and cultural industries. Second, the process is deconstructed into activities and each is examined for the extent of its embedded creativity. Third, informed by case evidence, four dysfunctions of the scenario planning process are conjectured: creativity layered on fantasy; heightened expectations and confusion; pride and passion; and creativity leading to excess. The paper concludes by suggesting four options for handling these potential dysfunctional effects and, in the light of the dialogue presented, re-interprets the definition of scenario planning presented earlier in the text.

[1]  B. Nijstad,et al.  The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science , 2004 .

[2]  R. Bradley MacKay,et al.  The role of hindsight in foresight: refining strategic reasoning , 2004 .

[3]  N. Anderson,et al.  Helping Creativity and Innovation Thrive in Organizations: Functional and Dysfunctional Perspectives , 2007 .

[4]  N. Anderson,et al.  Managing innovation and change : a critical guide for organizations , 2002 .

[5]  Henri Poincaré,et al.  The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, The Value of Science, Science and Method , 2012 .

[6]  Curtin Ll,et al.  Learning for the future? , 1994 .

[7]  J. Frey The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist attacks upon the United States , 2004 .

[8]  M. Boden WHAT IS CREATIVITY , 2005 .

[9]  Keith James,et al.  Positive and Negative Creativity in Groups, Institutions, and Organizations: A Model and Theoretical Extension , 1999 .

[10]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[11]  Patrick van der Duin,et al.  Fun with scenarios , 1998 .

[12]  H. Kahn,et al.  The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, , 1967 .

[13]  R. Whittington Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research , 2006 .

[14]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[15]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[16]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[17]  Katy Moyer,et al.  SCENARIO PLANNING AT BRITISH AIRWAYS: A CASE STUDY , 1996 .

[18]  Pierre Wack,et al.  Scenarios : Uncharted Waters Ahead , 1996 .

[19]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[20]  N. Anderson,et al.  Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology , 2001 .

[21]  M. West,et al.  The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation:a special issue introduction , 2004 .

[22]  Steve H. Barr,et al.  Person-Environment Fit and Creativity: An Examination of Supply-Value and Demand-Ability Versions of Fit , 1997 .

[23]  K. Cameron,et al.  Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .

[24]  C. Dreu When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams , 2006 .

[25]  Bertrand de Jouvenel,et al.  The Art of Conjecture. , 1968 .

[26]  P H Grinyer,et al.  A cognitive approach to group strategic decision taking: a discussion of evolved practice in the light of received research results , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[27]  David F. Radcliffe,et al.  Technological and Pedagogical Convergence between Work-based and Campus-based Learning , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  E. Bono Lateral thinking: Creativity Step by Step , 1970 .

[29]  M. Frese,et al.  Three Avenues for Future Research on Creativity, Innovation, and Initiative , 2004 .

[30]  M. Boden Dimensions of creativity , 1996 .

[31]  D. Price Jones,et al.  The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the next Thirty-three Years. , 1969 .

[32]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[33]  Michel Godet,et al.  Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool , 2001 .

[34]  R. Kanter The change masters : innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation , 1984 .

[35]  Ralph Katz The human side of managing technological innovation : a collection of readings , 2004 .

[36]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[37]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Research Companion to the Dysfunctional Workplace: Management Challenges and Symptoms , 2009 .

[38]  M. West Innovation and creativity at work , 1997 .

[39]  Nigel King,et al.  Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches , 1992 .

[40]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Counterproductive behaviors at work , 2001 .

[41]  M. West,et al.  Innovation at work. , 1990 .

[42]  R. Weisberg Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius , 1993 .

[43]  L. Wittgenstein Philosophical investigations = Philosophische Untersuchungen , 1958 .

[44]  Jennifer Mason,et al.  What is Creative Interviewing , 2010 .

[45]  Cynthia Selin,et al.  Trust and the illusive force of scenarios , 2006 .