Improved GPR interpretation through resolution of lateral velocity heterogeneity: Example from an archaeological site investigation

Abstract In a typical common-offset ground-penetrating radar (GPR) survey, lateral velocity contrasts may go undetected leading to misinterpretation. Resolution of lateral velocity heterogeneity requires multi-fold acquisition and analysis. Further, pre-stack depth migration (PSDM) is required to produce accurate images in the presence of large lateral velocity gradients. In an archaeological investigation conducted near Boise, Idaho, we delineated a portion of what we interpret to be an abandoned dump site. Using multi-fold acquisition with reflection tomography, we identified an abrupt lateral velocity increase of ∼ 40% resulting in a substantial velocity pull-up in the time domain. PSDM corrected for the velocity pull-up enabling a more accurate interpretation and identification of additional structures of potential historical significance. The migration velocity model provided additional constraints on materials which enhanced our understanding of the subsurface.

[1]  J. Bradford Applying Reflection Tomography in the Postmigration Domain to Multifold Ground-Penetrating Radar Data , 2006 .

[2]  E. Forte,et al.  2-D and 3-D processing and interpretation of multi-fold ground penetrating radar data:a case history from an archaeological site , 1999 .

[3]  F. M. Khalaf,et al.  New Tests for Porosity and Water Absorption of Fired Clay Bricks , 2002 .

[4]  Christof Stork,et al.  REFLECTION TOMOGRAPHY IN THE POSTMIGRATED DOMAIN , 1992 .

[5]  E. Forte,et al.  Multifold ground-penetrating radar and resistivity to study the stratigraphy of shallow unconsolidated sediments , 2003 .

[6]  Instantaneous Spectral Analysis: Time-Frequency Mapping Via Wavelet Matching With Application To 3D Gpr Contaminated Site Characterization , 2007 .

[7]  Sherif M. Hanafy,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar tomography for soil-moisture heterogeneity , 2006 .

[8]  Ning Guo,et al.  Becoming effective velocity-model builders and depth imagers, Part 2—The basics of velocity-model building, examples and discussions , 2002 .

[9]  John H. Bradford,et al.  Instantaneous Spectral Analysis: Time-Frequency Mapping via Wavelet Matching with Application to Contaminated-Site Characterization by 3D GPR , 2007 .

[10]  L. Slater,et al.  Low‐frequency electrical properties of peat , 2004 .

[11]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[12]  John H. Bradford,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar theory and application of thin-bed offset-dependent reflectivity , 2006 .

[13]  W. Barrash,et al.  Significance of porosity for stratigraphy and textural composition in subsurface, coarse fluvial deposits: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site , 2004 .

[14]  Dominique Gibert,et al.  Adaptation of prestack migration to multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) data , 2001 .

[15]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Acquisition and processing of wide-aperture ground-penetrating radar data , 1992 .