Active processing of biological motion perception: an ERP study.

The purpose of this study was to measure event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify how attention affects neural activity during the visual perception of biological motion (BM). Thirteen healthy subjects observed BM or scrambled motion (SM). For SM, each point had the same velocity vector as in BM, but the initial starting positions were randomized. Each BM and SM was overlaid with ten noise dots and four rectangles. For the rectangles, one was or was not rotated 90 degrees relative to the others. Subjects were required to undertake two kinds of visual tasks. For the attention-to-motion condition, subjects directed their attention to the type of motion. For the attention-to-rectangle condition, subjects directed their attention to the rotational angle of the overlaid rectangles. As in our earlier study, the ERP response to the perception of BM had two negative components at approximately 200 ms (N200) and approximately 330 ms (N330) in both attentional conditions. Our analysis focused on the amplitude of the second negative component, which was sensitive to BM. There was a significant interaction between attention and the type of motion regarding the amplitude of N330. Specifically, the amplitude of N330 in response to BM was greater in the attention-to-motion condition than in the attention-to-rectangle condition, and was greater than the amplitude of the response to SM in the attention-to-motion condition. These results suggest that in this experimental design, processing of BM is modulated by attention.

[1]  J. N. Bassili.  Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Gaze direction affects face perception in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Biological Motion Perception: an fMRI Study , 2022 .

[6]  D. Perrett,et al.  Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (STPa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[8]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[9]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  W. Dittrich.  Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[11]  D A Pollen,et al.  On the neural correlates of visual perception. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  James E. Cutting,et al.  A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays , 1978 .

[13]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[14]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Homan,et al.  Cerebral location of international 10-20 system electrode placement. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  R. Hari,et al.  Visual awareness of objects correlates with activity of right occipital cortex , 1996, Neuroreport.

[17]  Ricardo Insausti,et al.  Retrograde transport of D-[3H]-aspartate injected into the monkey amygdaloid complex , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  S. Brownlow,et al.  Perception of movement and dancer characteristics from point-light displays of dance , 1997 .

[19]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[20]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain , 1996, Current Biology.

[21]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[22]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[23]  D. Perrett,et al.  Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Yinpeng Jin,et al.  Attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials elicited by kinetic forms , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement: analysing gamma MEG activity. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  M Niedeggen,et al.  Characteristics of visual evoked potentials generated by motion coherence onset. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  B. Oken,et al.  Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[29]  R. D. Walk,et al.  Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays , 1984 .

[30]  Perception of Sex From Complex Body Movement in Young Children , 2000 .

[31]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials , 1995, Vision Research.

[32]  D. D. Hoffman,et al.  The interpretation of biological motion , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  J. N. Bassili.  Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. , 1978 .

[34]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Michael Bach,et al.  Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials , 1994, Vision Research.

[37]  J E Cutting,et al.  Masking the motions of human gait , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Jake K. Aggarwal,et al.  Structure from Motion of Rigid and Jointed Objects , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[40]  M Niedeggen,et al.  Motion Aftereffects with Random-Dot Chequerboard Kinematograms: Relation between Psychophysical and VEP Measures , 1994, Perception.

[41]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Structural encoding and recognition of biological motion: evidence from event-related potentials and source analysis , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[42]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[43]  Ian M. Thornton,et al.  Representation of Change: Separate Electrophysiological Markers of Attention, Awareness, and Implicit Processing , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Activation Timecourse of Ventral Visual Stream Object-recognition Areas: High Density Electrical Mapping of Perceptual Closure Processes , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[47]  R. Adolphs.  The neurobiology of social cognition , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[48]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[50]  H. Barbas.  Anatomic organization of basoventral and mediodorsal visual recipient prefrontal regions in the rhesus monkey , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[51]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[52]  S. Lea,et al.  Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance , 1996, Perception.

[53]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Separate neural pathways for contour and biological-motion cues in motion-defined animal shapes , 2003, NeuroImage.

[54]  N. Sadato,et al.  Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[55]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[56]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain Activity Evoked by the Perception of Human Walking: Controlling for Meaningful Coherent Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[58]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[59]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[60]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  A. Treisman,et al.  Voluntary Attention Modulates fMRI Activity in Human MT–MST , 1997, Neuron.